언어
챗봇 KG 근거 인용 · draft

주석[매튜 헨리] — 마태복음 22장 · 혼인 잔치 비유

요약
매튜 헨리 주석 · 섹션 6개 · 한국어 번역 있음(한국어 우선) · 본문 보기
아래 주석은 원문(및 번역문) 그대로입니다.

1~14절 카드 ↗

The Parable of the Marriage Feast. 1 And Jesus answered and spake unto them again by parables, and said, 2 The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son, 3 And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come. 4 Again, he sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready: come unto the marriage. 5 But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise: 6 And the remnant took his servants, and entreated them spitefully, and slew them. 7 But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. 8 Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. 9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage. 10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests. 11 And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 14 For many are called, but few are chosen. We have here the parable of the guests invited to the wedding-feast. In this it is said ( Matthew 22:1 ; Matthew 22:1 ), Jesus answered, not to what his opposers said (for they were put to silence), but to what they thought, when they were wishing for an opportunity to lay hands on him, Matthew 21:46 ; Matthew 21:46 . Note, Christ knows how to answer men's thoughts, for he is a Discerner of them. Or, He answered, that is, he continued his discourse to the same purport; for this parable represents the gospel offer, and the entertainment it meets with, as the former, but under another similitude. The parable of the vineyard represents the sin of the rulers that persecuted the prophets; it shows also the sin of the people, who generally neglected the message, while their great ones were persecuting the messengers. I. Gospel preparations are here represented by a feast which a king made at the marriage of his son; such is the kingdom of heaven, such the provision made for precious souls, in and by the new covenant. The King is God, a great King, King of kings. Now, 1. Here is a marriage made for his son, Christ is the Bridegroom, the church is the bride; the gospel-day is the day of his espousals, Song of Solomon 3:11 . Behold by faith the church of the first-born, that are written in heaven, and were given to Christ by him whose they were; and in them you see the bride, the Lamb's wife, Revelation 21:9 . The gospel covenant is a marriage covenant betwixt Christ and believers, and it is a marriage of God's making. This branch of the similitude is only mentioned, and not prosecuted here. 2. Here is a dinner prepared for this marriage, Matthew 22:4 ; Matthew 22:4 . All the privileges of church-membership, and all the blessings of the new covenant, pardon of sin, the favour of God, peace of conscience, the promises of the gospel, and all the riches contained in them, access to the throne of grace, the comforts of the Spirit, and a well-grounded hope of eternal life. These are the preparations for this feast, a heaven upon earth now, and a heaven in heaven shortly. God has prepared it in his counsel, in his covenant. It is a dinner, denoting present privileges in the midst of our day, beside the supper at night in glory. (1.) It is a feast. Gospel preparations were prophesied of as a feast ( Isaiah 25:6 ), a feast of fat things, and were typified by the many festivals of the ceremonial law ( 1 Corinthians 5:8 ); Let us keep the feast. A feast is a good day ( Esther 7:17 ); so is the gospel; it is a continual feast. Oxen and fatlings are killed for this feast; no niceties, but substantial food; enough, and enough of the best. The day of a feast is a day of slaughter, or sacrifice, James 5:5 . Gospel preparations are all founded in the death of Christ, his sacrifice of himself. A feast was made for love, it is a reconciliation feast, a token of God's goodwill toward men. It was made for laughter ( Ecclesiastes 10:19 ), it is a rejoicing feast. It was made for fulness; the design of the gospel was to fill every hungry soul with good things. It was made for fellowship, to maintain an intercourse between heaven and earth. We are sent for to the banquet of wine, that we may tell what is our petition, and what is our request. (2.) It is a wedding feast. Wedding feasts are usually rich, free, and joyful. The first miracle Christ wrought, was, to make plentiful provision for a wedding feast ( John 2:7 ); and surely then he will not be wanting in provision for his own wedding feast, when the marriage of the Lamb is come, and the bride hath made herself ready, a victorious triumphant feast, Revelation 19:7 ; Revelation 19:17 ; Revelation 19:18 . (3.) It is a royal wedding feast; it is the feast of a king ( 1 Samuel 25:36 ), at the marriage, not of a servant, but of a son; and then, if ever, he will, like Ahasuerus, show the riches of his glorious kingdom, Esther 1:4 . The provision made for believers in the covenant of grace, is not such as worthless worms, like us, had any reason to expect, but such as it becomes the King of glory to give. He gives like himself; for he gives himself to be to them El shaddai--a God that is enough, a feast indeed for a soul. II. Gospel calls and offers are represented by an invitation to this feast. Those that make a feast will have guests to grace the feast with. God's guests are the children of men. Lord, what is man, that he should be thus dignified! The guests that were first invited were the Jews; wherever the gospel is preached, this invitation is given; ministers are the servants that are sent to invite, Proverbs 9:4 ; Proverbs 9:5 . Now, 1. The guests are called, bidden to the wedding. All that are within hearing of the joyful sound of the gospel, to them is the word of this invitation sent. The servants that bring the invitation do not set down their names in a paper; there is no occasion for that, since none are excluded but those that exclude themselves. Those that are bidden to the dinner are bidden to the wedding; for all that partake of gospel privileges are to give a due and respectful attendance on the Lord Jesus, as the faithful friends and humble servants of the Bridegroom. They are bidden to the wedding, that they may go forth to meet the bridegroom; for it is the Father's will that all men should honour the Son. 2. The guests are called upon; for in the gospel there are not only gracious proposals made, but gracious persuasives. We persuade men, we beseech them in Christ's stead, 2 Corinthians 5:11 ; 2 Corinthians 5:20 . See how much Christ's heart is set upon the happiness of poor souls! He not only provides for them, in consideration of their want, but sends to them, in consideration of their weakness and forgetfulness. When the invited guests were slack in coming, the king sent forth other servants, Matthew 22:4 ; Matthew 22:4 . When the prophets of the Old Testament prevailed not, nor John the Baptist, nor Christ himself, who told them the entertainment was almost ready ( the kingdom of God was at hand ), the apostles and ministers of the gospel were sent after Christ's resurrection, to tell them it was come, it was quite ready; and to persuade them to accept the offer. One would think it had been enough to give men an intimation that they had leave to come, and should be welcome; that, during the solemnity of the wedding, the king kept open house; but, because the natural man discerns not, and therefore desires not, the things of the Spirit of God, we are pressed to accept the call by the most powerful inducements, drawn with the cords of a man, and all the bonds of love. If the repetition of the call will move us, Behold, the Spirit saith, Come; and the bride saith, Come; let him that heareth say, Come; let him that is athirst come, Revelation 22:17 . If the reason of the call will work upon us, Behold, the dinner is prepared, the oxen and fatlings are killed, and all things are ready; the Father is ready to accept of us, the Son to intercede for us, the Spirit to sanctify us; pardon is ready; peace is ready, comfort is ready; the promises are ready, as wells of living water for supply; ordinances are ready, as golden pipes for conveyance; angels are ready to attend us, creatures are ready to be in league with us, providences are ready to work for our good, and heaven, at last, is ready to receive us; it is a kingdom prepared, ready to be revealed in the last time. Is all this ready; and shall we be unready? Is all this preparation made for us; and is there any room to doubt of our welcome, if we come in a right manner? Come, therefore, O come to the marriage; we beseech you, receive not all this grace of God in vain, 2 Corinthians 6:1 . III. The cold treatment which the gospel of Christ often meets with among the children of men, represented by the cold treatment that this message met with and the hot treatment that the messengers met with, in both which the king himself and the royal bridegroom are affronted. This reflects primarily upon the Jews, who rejected the counsel of God against themselves; but it looks further, to the contempt that would, by many in all ages, be put upon, and the opposition that would be given to, the gospel of Christ. 1. The message was basely slighted ( Matthew 22:3 ; Matthew 22:3 ); They would not come. Note, The reason why sinners come not to Christ and salvation by him is, not because they cannot, but because they will not ( John 5:40 ); Ye will not come to me. This will aggravate the misery of sinners, that they might have had happiness for the coming for, but it was their own act and deed to refuse it. I would, and ye would not. But this was not all ( Matthew 22:5 ; Matthew 22:5 ); they made light of it; they thought it not worth coming for; thought the messengers made more ado than needs; let them magnify the preparations ever so much, they could feast as well at home. Note, Making light of Christ, and of the great salvation wrought out by him, is the damning sin of the world. Amelesantes -- They were careless. Note, Multitudes perish eternally through mere carelessness, who have not any direct aversion, but a prevailing indifference, to the matters of their souls, and an unconcernedness about them. And the reason why they made light of the marriage feast was, because they had other things that they minded more, and had more mind to; they went their ways, one to his farm, and another to his merchandise. Note, The business and profit of worldly employments prove to many a great hindrance in closing with Christ: none turn their back on the feast, but with some plausible excuse or other, Luke 14:18 . The country people have their farms to look after, about which there is always something or other to do; the town's people must tend their shops, and be constant upon the exchange; they must buy, and sell, and get gain. It is true, that both farmers and merchants must be diligent in their business but not so as to keep them from making religion their main business. Licitis perimus omnes--These lawful things undo us, when they are unlawfully managed, when we are so careful and troubled about many things as to neglect the one thing needful. Observe, Both the city and the country have their temptations, the merchandise in the one, and the farms in the other; so that, whatever we have of the world in our hands, our care must be to keep it out of our hearts, lest it come between us and Christ. 2. The messengers were basely abused; The remnant, or the rest of them, that is, those who did not go the farms, or merchandise, were neither husbandmen nor tradesmen, but ecclesiastics, the scribes, and Pharisees, and chief priests; these were the persecutors, these took the servants, and treated them spitefully, and slew them. This, in the parable, is unaccountable, never any could be so rude and barbarous as this, to servants that came to invite them to a feast; but, in the application of the parable, it was matter of fact; they whose feet should have been beautiful, because they brought the glad tidings of the solemn feasts ( Nahum 1:15 ), were treated as the offscouring of all things, 1 Corinthians 4:13 . The prophets and John the Baptist had been thus abused already, and the apostles and ministers of Christ must count upon the same. The Jews were, either directly or indirectly, agents in most of the persecutions of the first preachers of the gospel; witness the history of the Acts, that is, the sufferings of the apostles. IV. The utter ruin that was coming upon the Jewish church and nation is here represented by the revenge which the king, in wrath, took on these insolent recusants ( Matthew 22:7 ; Matthew 22:7 ); He was wroth. The Jews, who had been the people of God's love and blessing, by rejecting the gospel became the generation of his wrath and curse. Wrath came upon them to the uttermost, 1 Thessalonians 2:16 . Now observe here, 1. What was the crying sin that brought the ruin; it was their being murderers. He does not say, he destroyed those despisers of his call, but those murderers of his servants; as if God were more jealous for the lives of his ministers than for the honour of his gospel; he that toucheth them, toucheth the apple of his eye. Note, Persecution of Christ's faithful ministers fills the measure of guilt more than any thing. Filling Jerusalem with innocent blood was that sin of Manasseh which the Lord would not pardon, 2 Kings 24:4 . 2. What was the ruin itself, that was coming; He sent forth his armies. The Roman armies were his armies, of his raising, of his sending against the people of his wrath; and he gave them a charge to tread them down, Isaiah 10:6 . God is the Lord of men's host, and makes what use he pleases of them, to serve his own purposes, though they mean not so, neither doth their heart think so, Isaiah 10:7 . See Micah 4:11 ; Micah 4:12 . His armies destroyed those murderers, and burnt up their city. This points out very plainly the destruction of the Jews, and the burning of Jerusalem, by the Romans, forty years after this. No age ever saw a greater desolation than that, nor more of the direful effects of fire and sword. Though Jerusalem had been a holy city, the city that God had chosen, to put his name there, beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth; yet that city being now become a harlot, righteousness being no longer lodged in it, but murderers, the worst of murderers (as the prophet speaks, Isaiah 1:21 ), judgment came upon it, and ruin without remedy; and it is set forth for an example to all that should oppose Christ and his gospel. It was the Lord's doing, to avenge the quarrel of his covenant. V. The replenishing of the church again, by the bringing in of the Gentiles, is here represented by the furnishing of the feast with guests out of the high-ways, Matthew 22:8-10 ; Matthew 22:8-10 . Here is, 1. The complaint of the master of the feast concerning those that were first bidden ( Matthew 22:8 ; Matthew 22:8 ), The wedding is ready, the covenant of grace ready to be sealed, a church ready to be founded; but they which were bidden, that is, the Jews, to whom pertained the covenant and the promises, by which they were of old invited to the feast of fat things, they were not worthy, they were utterly unworthy, and, by their contempt of Christ, had forfeited all the privileges they were invited to. Note, It is not owing to God, that sinners perish, but to themselves. Thus, when Israel of old was within sight of Canaan, the land of promise was ready, the milk and honey ready, but their unbelief and murmuring, and contempt of that pleasant land, shut them out, and their carcases were left to perish in the wilderness; and these things happened to them for ensamples. See 1 Corinthians 10:11 ; Hebrews 3:16-4 . 2. The commission he gave to the servants, to invite other guests. The inhabitants of the city ( Matthew 22:7 ; Matthew 22:7 ) had refused; Go into the high-ways then; into the way of the Gentiles, which at first they were to decline, Matthew 10:5 ; Matthew 10:5 . Thus by the fall of the Jews salvation is come to the Gentiles, Romans 11:11 ; Romans 11:12 ; Ephesians 3:8 . Note, Christ will have a kingdom in the world, though many reject the grace, and resist the power, of that kingdom. Though Israel be not gathered, he will be glorious. The offer of Christ and salvation to the Gentiles was, (1.) Unlooked for and unexpected; such a surprise as it would be to wayfaring men upon the road to be met with an invitation to a wedding feast. The Jews had notice of the gospel, long before, and expected the Messiah and his kingdom; but to the Gentiles it was all new, what they had never heard of before ( Acts 17:19 ; Acts 17:20 ), and, consequently, what they could not conceive of as belonging to them. See Isaiah 65:1 ; Isaiah 65:2 . (2.) It was universal and undistinguishing; Go, and bid as many as you find. The highways are public places, and there Wisdom cries, Proverbs 1:20 . "Ask them that go by the way, ask any body ( Job 21:29 ), high and low, rich and poor, bond and free, young and old, Jew and Gentile; tell them all, that they shall be welcome to gospel-privileges upon gospel-terms; whoever will, let him come, without exception." 3. The success of this second invitation; if some will not come, others will ( Matthew 22:10 ; Matthew 22:10 ); They gathered together all, as many as they found. The servants obeyed their orders. Jonah was sent into the high-ways, but was so tender of the honour of his country, that he avoided the errand; but Christ's apostles, though Jews, preferred the service of Christ before their respect to their nation; and St. Paul, though sorrowing for the Jews, yet magnifies his office as the apostle of Gentiles. They gathered together all. The design of the gospel is, (1.) To gather souls together; not the nation of the Jews only, but all the children of God who were scattered abroad ( John 11:52 ), the other sheep that were not of that fold, John 10:16 . They were gathered into one body, one family, one corporation. (2.) To gather them together to the wedding-feast, to pay their respect to Christ, and to partake of the privileges of the new covenant. Where the dole is, there will the poor be gathered together. Now the guests that were gathered were, [1.] A multitude, all, as many as they found; so many, that the guest-chamber was filled. The sealed ones of the Jews were numbered, but those of other nations were without number, a very great multitude, Revelation 7:9 . See Isaiah 60:4 ; Isaiah 60:8 . [2.] A mixed multitude, both bad and good; some that before their conversion were sober and well-inclined, as the devout Greeks ( Acts 17:4 ) and Cornelius; others that had run to an excess of riot, as the Corinthians ( 1 Corinthians 6:11 ); Such were some of you; or, some that after their conversion proved bad, that turned not to the Lord with all their heart, but feignedly; others that were upright and sincere, and proved of the right class. Ministers, in casting the net of the gospel, enclose both good fish and bad; but the Lord knows them that are his. VI. The case of hypocrites, who are in the church, but not of it, who have a name to live, but are not alive indeed, is represented by the guest that had not on a wedding garment; one of the bad that were gathered in. Those come short of salvation by Christ, not only who refuse to take upon them the profession of religion, but who are not sound at heart in that profession. Concerning this hypocrite observe, 1. His discovery, how he was found out, Matthew 22:11 ; Matthew 22:11 . (1.) The king came in to see the guests, to bid those welcome who came prepared, and to turn those out who came otherwise. Note, The God of heaven takes particular notice of those who profess religion, and have a place and name in the visible church. Our Lord Jesus walks among the golden candlesticks and therefore knows their works. See Revelation 2:1 ; Revelation 2:2 ; Song of Solomon 7:12 . Let this be a warning to us against hypocrisy, that disguises will shortly be stripped off, and every man will appear in his own colours; and an encouragement to us in our sincerity, that God is a witness to it. Observe, This hypocrite was never discovered to be without a wedding garment, till the king himself came in to see the guests. Note, It is God's prerogative to know who are sound at heart in their profession, and who are not. We may be deceived in men, either one way or other; but He cannot. The day of judgment will be the great discovering day, when all the guests will be presented to the King: then he will separate between the precious and the vile ( Matthew 25:32 ; Matthew 25:32 ), the secrets of all hearts will then be made manifest, and we shall infallibly discern between the righteous and the wicked, which now it is not easy to do. It concerns all the guests, to prepare for the scrutiny, and to consider how they will pass the piercing eye of the heart-searching God. (2.) As soon as he came in, he presently espied the hypocrite; He saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment; though but one, he soon had his eye upon him; there is no hope of being hid in a crowd from the arrests of divine justice; he had not on a wedding garment; he was not dressed as became a nuptial solemnity; he had not his best clothes on. Note, Many come to the wedding feast without a wedding garment. If the gospel be the wedding feast, then the wedding garment is a frame of heart, and a course of life agreeable to the gospel and our profession of it, worthy of the vocation wherewith we are called ( Ephesians 4:1 ), as becomes the gospel of Christ, Philippians 1:27 . The righteousness of saints, their real holiness and sanctification, and Christ, made Righteousness to them, is the clean linen, Revelation 19:8 . This man was not naked, or in rags; some raiment he had, but not a wedding garment. Those, and those only, who put on the Lord Jesus, that have a Christian temper of mind, and are adorned with Christian graces, who live by faith in Christ, and to whom he is all in all, have the wedding garment. 2. His trial ( Matthew 22:12 ; Matthew 22:12 ); and here we may observe, (1.) How he was arraigned ( Matthew 22:12 ; Matthew 22:12 ); Friend, how camest thou in hither, not having a wedding garment? A startling question to one that was priding himself in the place he securely possessed at the feast. Friend! That was a cutting word; a seeming friend, a pretended friend, a friend in profession, under manifold ties and obligations to be a friend. Note, There are many in the church who are false friends to Jesus Christ, who say that they love him while their hearts are not with him. How camest thou in hither? He does not chide the servants for letting him in (the wedding garment is an inward thing, ministers must go according to that which falls within their cognizance); but he checks his presumption in crowding in, when he knew that his heart was not upright; "How durst thou claim a share in gospel benefits, when thou hadst no regard to gospel rules? What has thou to do to declare my statutes? " Psalms 50:16 ; Psalms 50:17 . Such are spots in the feast, dishonour the bridegroom, affront the company, and disgrace themselves; and therefore, How camest thou in hither? Note, The day is coming, when hypocrites will be called to an account for all their presumptuous intrusion into gospel ordinances, and usurpation of gospel privileges. Who hath required this at your hand? Isaiah 1:12 . Despised sabbaths and abused sacraments must be reckoned for, and judgment taken out upon an action of waste against all those who received the grace of God in vain. "How camest thou to the Lord's table, at such a time, unhumbled and unsanctified? What brought thee to sit before God's prophets, as his people do, when thy heart went after thy covetousness? How camest thou in? Not by the door, but some other way, as a thief and a robber. It was a tortuous entry, a possession without colour of a title." Note, It is good for those that have a place in the church, often to put it to themselves, "How came I in hither? Have I a wedding-garment?" If we would thus judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (2.) How he was convicted; he was speechless: ephimothe -- he was muzzled (so the word is used, 1 Corinthians 9:9 ); the man stood mute, upon his arraignment, being convicted and condemned by his own conscience. They who live within the church, and die without Christ, will not have one word to say for themselves in the judgment of the great day, they will be without excuse; should they plead, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, as they do, Luke 13:26 , that is to plead guilty; for the crime they are charged with, is thrusting themselves into the presence of Christ, and to his table, before they were called. They who never heard a word of this wedding feast will have more to say for themselves; their sin will be more excusable, and their condemnation more tolerable, than theirs who came to the feast without the wedding garment, and so sin against the clearest light and dearest love. 3. His sentence ( Matthew 22:13 ; Matthew 22:13 ); Bind him hand and foot, c. (1.) He is ordered to be pinioned, as condemned malefactors are, to be manacled and shackled. Those that will not work and walk as they should, may expect to be bound hand and foot. There is a binding in this world by the servants, the ministers, whose suspending of persons that walk disorderly, to the scandal of religion, is called binding of them, Matthew 18:18 ; Matthew 18:18 . "Bind them up from partaking of special ordinances, and the peculiar privileges of their church-membership; bind them over to the righteous judgment of god." In the day of judgment, hypocrites will be bound; the angels shall bind up these tares in bundles for the fire, Matthew 13:41 ; Matthew 13:41 . Damned sinners are bound hand and foot by an irreversible sentence; this signifies the same with the fixing of the great gulf; they can neither resist nor outrun their punishment. (2.) He is ordered to be carried off from the wedding feast; Take him away. When the wickedness of hypocrites appears, they are to be taken away from the communion of the faithful, to be cut of as withered branches. This bespeaks the punishment of loss in the other world; they shall be taken away from the king, from the kingdom, from the wedding feast, Depart from me, ye cursed. It will aggravate their misery, that (like the unbelieving lord, 2 Kings 7:2 ), they shall see all this plenty with their eyes, but shall not taste of it. Note, Those that walk unworthy of their Christianity, forfeit all the happiness they presumptuously laid claim to, and complimented themselves with a groundless expectation of. (3.) He is ordered into a doleful dungeon; Cast him into utter darkness. Our Saviour here insensibly slides out of this parable into that which it intimates--the damnation of hypocrites in the other world. Hell is utter darkness, it is darkness out of heaven, the land of light; or it is extreme darkness, darkness to the last degree, without the least ray or spark of light, or hope of it, like that of Egypt; darkness which might be felt; the blackness of darkness, as darkness itself, Job 10:22 . Note, Hypocrites go by the light of the gospel itself down to utter darkness; and hell will be hell indeed to such, a condemnation more intolerable; there shall be weeping, and gnashing of teeth. This our Saviour often uses as part of the description of hell-torments, which are hereby represented, not so much by the misery itself, as by the resentment sinners will have of it; there shall be weeping, an expression of great sorrow and anguish; not a gush of tears, which gives present ease, but constant weeping, which is constant torment; and the gnashing of teeth is an expression of the greatest rage and indignation; they will be like a wild bull in a net, full of the fury of the Lord, Isaiah 51:20 ; Isaiah 8:21 ; Isaiah 8:22 . Let us therefore hear and fear. Lastly, The parable is concluded with that remarkable saying which we had before ( Matthew 20:16 ; Matthew 20:16 ), Many are called, but few are chosen, Matthew 22:14 ; Matthew 22:14 . Of the many that are called to the wedding feast, if you set aside all those as unchosen that make light of it, and avowedly prefer other things before it; if then you set aside all that make a profession of religion, but the temper of whose spirits and the tenour of whose conversation are a constant contradiction to it; if you set aside all the profane, and all the hypocritical, you will find that they are few, very few, that are chosen; many called to the wedding feast, but few chosen to the wedding garment, that is, to salvation, by sanctification of the Spirit. This is the strait gate, and narrow way, which few find. return to ' Top of Page ' <a name="verses-15-22" class="com-number"

Pericope (part_of)

절 (explains)

bible-text/mat-22-1, bible-text/mat-22-2, bible-text/mat-22-3, bible-text/mat-22-4, bible-text/mat-22-5, bible-text/mat-22-6, bible-text/mat-22-7, bible-text/mat-22-8, bible-text/mat-22-9, bible-text/mat-22-10, bible-text/mat-22-11, bible-text/mat-22-12, bible-text/mat-22-13, bible-text/mat-22-14

Source

> 예수께서 다시 비유로 그들에게 대답하여 말씀하셨다. "하늘 나라는 자기 아들을 위하여 혼인 잔치를 베푼 어떤 임금과 같다. 그는 종들을 보내어 잔치에 초대받은 사람들을 불러오게 하였으나, 그들은 오려고 하지 않았다. 임금은 다시 다른 종들을 보내며 말하였다. '초대받은 사람들에게 전하여라. 보라, 내가 잔치를 준비하였다. 내 소와 살진 짐승을 잡았고 모든 것이 준비되었으니, 혼인 잔치에 오너라.' 그러나 그들은 이를 대수롭지 않게 여기고 제 갈 길로 갔는데, 하나는 자기 밭으로, 또 하나는 자기 장사하러 갔다. 그리고 나머지 사람들은 그의 종들을 붙잡아 모욕하고 죽였다. 임금은 그 말을 듣고 진노하여 자기 군대를 보내 그 살인자들을 멸하고 그들의 성을 불살랐다. 그러고 나서 그는 종들에게 말하였다. '혼인 잔치는 준비되었으나 초대받은 사람들은 합당하지 못하였다. 그러니 너희는 한길 네거리로 나가 만나는 사람마다 모두 혼인 잔치에 초대하여라.' 그 종들은 한길로 나가서 만나는 대로 악한 사람이나 선한 사람이나 모두 불러 모았고, 그리하여 잔칫집은 손님들로 가득 찼다. 그런데 임금이 손님들을 보려고 들어왔다가, 거기에 예복을 입지 않은 한 사람을 보았다. 임금이 그에게 말하였다. '친구여, 그대는 어찌하여 예복을 입지 않고 여기 들어왔는가?' 그 사람은 아무 말도 하지 못하였다. 그러자 임금이 종들에게 말하였다. '저 사람의 손과 발을 묶어 바깥 어둠 속으로 내쫓아라. 거기서 슬피 울며 이를 갈 것이다.' 부름받은 사람은 많으나 택함받은 사람은 적다." (마 22:1-14)

여기서 우리는 혼인 잔치에 초대받은 손님들의 비유를 살펴본다. 이 비유의 서두에서(마 22:1) "예수께서 대답하셨다"는 표현이 나오는데, 이는 반대자들의 말에 대한 대답이 아니라—그들은 이미 입을 다물었기 때문이다—그들의 생각에 대한 대답이다. 그들은 마침 예수님을 잡을 기회를 노리고 있었다(마 21:46). 주목하라. 그리스도는 마음을 꿰뚫어 보시는 분이시므로 사람들의 생각에 대답하실 수 있다. 혹은 이 "대답"은 앞의 담화를 이어가는 것으로, 이 비유 역시 복음의 초대와 그것이 만나는 반응을 묘사하되 다른 비유를 통해 다시 보여 주는 것이다. 포도원 비유가 선지자들을 박해한 지도자들의 죄를 보여 준다면, 이 비유는 그 메시지를 전반적으로 무시하는 백성의 죄도 드러낸다.

**첫째, 복음의 준비는 임금이 아들을 위해 베푼 잔치로 묘사된다.** 하늘 나라는 그러하고, 귀한 영혼들을 위해 새 언약 안에서 마련된 것이 그러하다. 임금은 하나님이시니, 왕들의 왕이시다. (1) 여기서 아들을 위한 혼인이 이루어진다. 그리스도는 신랑이시고, 교회는 신부이다. 복음의 날은 그분의 혼인날이다(아 3:11을 보라). 믿음의 눈으로 장자들의 교회를 바라보라. 복음의 언약은 그리스도와 믿는 자들 사이의 혼인 언약이며, 이 혼인은 하나님께서 이루시는 혼인이다. (2) 이 혼인을 위한 잔치가 준비되었다(마 22:4). 죄 사함, 하나님의 은혜, 양심의 평안, 복음의 약속들 안에 담긴 모든 복—이것들이 잔치의 준비이다. 이것은 현세에서는 땅 위의 하늘이요, 내세에서는 하늘의 하늘이다. 하나님은 그의 계획 안에서, 그의 언약 안에서 이것을 준비하셨다. [1] 그것은 잔치이다. 황소와 살진 짐승을 잡았고, 사치가 아니라 실속 있는 음식이 넘친다. 복음의 준비는 모두 그리스도의 죽음, 곧 그분의 자기 희생 위에 세워져 있다. [2] 혼인 잔치이다. 혼인 잔치는 보통 풍성하고 자유롭고 기쁨이 넘친다. 그리스도는 첫 번째 기적을 혼인 잔치에서 행하셨으니(요 2:7), 그분 자신의 혼인 잔치를 위한 준비에 부족함이 있겠는가. [3] 왕의 혼인 잔치이다. 왕가의 혼인은—그것도 종이 아닌 아들의 혼인에서는—왕이 자기 왕국의 영광스러운 부요함을 온전히 드러낸다. 은혜의 언약 안에서 믿는 자들을 위해 준비된 것은 우리가 기대할 수 있는 것을 훨씬 뛰어넘는다.

**둘째, 복음의 초대와 부르심은 잔치에 오도록 손님을 부르는 것으로 묘사된다.** 하나님의 손님들은 사람들이다. 하나님의 초대를 받은 첫 손님들은 유대인들이었다. 복음이 전파되는 곳마다 이 초대는 주어진다. 목사들은 사람들을 초대하도록 보냄받은 종들이다. (1) 손님들은 부름을 받았다. 기쁜 소식의 소리를 들을 수 있는 모든 이에게 이 초대가 전해진다. 잔치에 초대받은 자들은 혼인 잔치에 초대받은 것이다. 복음의 특권에 참여하는 모든 이들은 신랑이신 주 예수님 앞에 신실한 친구요 겸손한 종으로서 합당히 예를 갖추어야 한다. (2) 손님들은 간청받았다. 복음 안에는 은혜로운 제안만이 아니라 은혜로운 권고도 있다. "우리가 권면합니다, 우리가 그리스도를 대신하여 간청합니다"(고후 5:11, 20). 주님께서 초대받은 손님들이 더디 오는 것을 보시고 다른 종들을 다시 보내셨을 때(마 22:4), 이는 구약의 선지자들이, 세례 요한이, 그리스도 자신이 오신 뒤에도 사도들과 복음 목사들이 파송받은 것을 나타낸다. 우리를 움직이기에 충분한 이유가 있다. "보라, 잔치가 준비되었다. 소와 살진 짐승을 잡았고, 모든 것이 준비되었다." 아버지는 우리를 받아 주실 준비가, 아들은 우리를 위해 중보하실 준비가, 성령은 우리를 거룩하게 하실 준비가 되어 있다. 사함이 준비되어 있고, 평안이 준비되어 있고, 위로가 준비되어 있다. 약속들이 생수의 우물처럼 공급할 준비가 되어 있고, 규례들이 공급의 통로로서 준비되어 있다. 천사들이 우리를 섬길 준비가 되어 있고, 섭리가 우리의 유익을 위해 일할 준비가 되어 있고, 하늘은 마침내 우리를 받아들일 준비가 되어 있다. 이 모든 것이 준비되어 있는데 우리가 준비되지 않을 수 있겠는가?

**셋째, 복음이 사람들 가운데 종종 받는 냉대는 이 메시지가 받은 냉대와 사자들이 받은 박해로 묘사된다.** 이것은 주로 유대인들이 스스로 향한 하나님의 뜻을 거부한 것을 가리키지만, 그보다 더 나아가 모든 시대에 많은 이가 복음을 경멸하고 대적하리라는 것을 보여 준다. (1) 그 메시지는 심하게 무시당하였다(마 22:3). "그들은 오려고 하지 않았다." 주목하라. 죄인들이 그리스도와 그로 인한 구원에 나아오지 않는 이유는 올 수 없기 때문이 아니라 오려 하지 않기 때문이다(요 5:40). 그것도 모자라(마 22:5) 그들은 이를 대수롭지 않게 여겼다. 그들은 전령들이 준비를 아무리 크게 말해도 집에서도 그만큼 먹을 수 있다고 생각하였다. 주목하라. 그리스도와 그로 인한 위대한 구원을 대수롭지 않게 여기는 것이 세상의 멸망을 가져오는 죄이다. 많은 이들이 영적인 일들에 대한 직접적인 거부감 없이도, 다만 우세한 무관심 때문에, 그 일들에 마음을 쓰지 않기 때문에 영원히 멸망한다. 그들이 혼인 잔치를 대수롭지 않게 여긴 이유는 더 신경 쓰는 다른 것들이 있었기 때문이다. 하나는 자기 밭으로, 다른 하나는 자기 장사하러 갔다. 주목하라. 세상 직업의 일과 이익이 많은 이들에게 그리스도를 마음에 받아들이는 데 큰 걸림돌이 된다. 농부도 상인도 각자의 일에 부지런해야 한다. 그러나 종교를 자신의 가장 중요한 일로 삼는 것을 방해할 만큼 그 일에 얽매여서는 안 된다. 도시에도 시골에도 각각의 유혹이 있다. 도시에는 장사, 시골에는 밭이 있다. 우리가 손에 무엇을 가지고 있든, 그것이 마음속으로 들어오지 않게—그것이 우리와 그리스도 사이에 끼어들지 않게—조심해야 한다. (2) 사자들이 심하게 박해를 받았다. 나머지 사람들은 종들을 붙잡아 모욕하고 죽였다. 이것은 파라볼에서는 이해할 수 없는 일이다. 그러나 비유의 적용에서는 실제로 일어난 일이다. 선지자들이 이미 그렇게 학대를 받았고, 그리스도의 사도들과 목사들도 같은 일을 각오해야 했다.

**넷째, 유대 교회와 민족에게 임할 완전한 멸망은 이 무례한 거절자들에게 임금이 진노로 보복하는 것으로 묘사된다(마 22:7).** "임금은 진노하였다." 하나님의 사랑과 복의 백성이었던 유대인들이 복음을 거부함으로써 그분의 진노와 저주의 세대가 되었다. 진노가 끝내 그들에게 임하였다(살전 2:16). 주목하라. (1) 멸망을 가져온 부르짖는 죄는 그들이 살인자였다는 것이다. 임금은 초대를 멸시한 자들을 멸하는 것이 아니라 그 종들을 죽인 살인자들을 멸한다고 말씀하신다. 마치 하나님께서 복음의 영예보다 목사들의 생명을 더 소중히 여기시는 것처럼. 그들을 해치는 자는 그분의 눈동자를 건드리는 자이다. 주목하라. 그리스도의 신실한 사역자들을 박해하는 것은 다른 어떤 것보다 죄의 분량을 채운다. (2) 멸망 자체는 이러했다. "그분은 자기 군대를 보냈다." 로마 군대는 그분의 군대이니, 그분이 일으키시고 진노의 백성을 치도록 그분이 보내셨다. 이 군대들이 그 살인자들을 멸하고 그들의 성을 불살랐다. 이것은 이 말씀 이후 약 사십 년 뒤에 로마인들에 의한 유대인 멸망과 예루살렘 소각을 분명히 가리킨다. 어느 시대에도 그 멸망보다 더한 황폐함을 본 적이 없다.

**다섯째, 이방 사람들을 교회로 불러들임으로써 교회가 다시 채워지는 것은 한길에서 데려온 손님들로 잔치가 채워지는 것으로 묘사된다(마 22:8-10).** (1) 잔치 주인이 처음 초대받은 자들에 대해 불평한다(마 22:8). "혼인 잔치는 준비되었으나 초대받은 사람들은 합당하지 못하였다." 유대인들이 그리스도를 멸시함으로써 자신들이 초대받은 모든 특권을 스스로 박탈하였다. 주목하라. 죄인들이 멸망하는 것은 하나님 때문이 아니라 자신들 때문이다. (2) 종들에게 다른 손님들을 초대하라는 위임이 주어진다. 성 안의 주민들이 거부하였으니, 한길로 나가라. 이것은 이방 사람들에게로 나아가는 것이다. 이처럼 유대인들의 넘어짐으로 이방 사람들에게 구원이 이르렀다(롬 11:11-12). 주목하라. 그리스도는 많은 이들이 은혜를 거부하고 그 나라의 권능에 저항할지라도 세상에 나라를 가지실 것이다. 이방 사람들에게 복음이 제공된 것은 (1) 예상치 못하고 뜻밖의 일이었다. 유대인들은 메시아와 그 나라를 오래전부터 알고 기다렸지만, 이방 사람들에게는 전혀 들어 본 적 없는 새로운 일이었다(행 17:19-20). (2) 보편적이고 차별이 없는 것이었다. "만나는 사람은 모두 초대하여라." 한길은 공공장소이니, 지혜가 거기서 외친다(잠 1:20). 높고 낮은 자, 부유하고 가난한 자, 종과 자유인, 젊은이와 노인, 유대인과 이방 사람, 누구든지 원하는 자들에게 복음의 특권이 복음의 조건에 따라 개방된다(계 22:17을 보라). (3) 두 번째 초대의 성과가 있었다. 어떤 이들이 오지 않으면 다른 이들이 온다(마 22:10). 종들이 명령에 순종하였다. 그들은 만나는 대로 모두 불러 모았다. 복음의 설계는 (1) 영혼들을 함께 모으는 것이다. 유대인 민족만이 아니라, 흩어진 하나님의 모든 자녀들을(요 11:52), 이 우리에 속하지 않은 다른 양들을 불러 모은다(요 10:16). (2) 그들을 혼인 잔치에, 곧 새 언약의 특권들에 참여하게 하는 것이다. 모인 손님들은 [1] 수가 많았다. 잔칫집이 가득 찼다. 유대인의 인장 받은 자들은 수가 셌지만, 다른 민족들은 셀 수도 없는 큰 무리였다(계 7:9). [2] 섞인 무리였다. 악한 사람과 선한 사람, 둘 다 있었다. 목사들은 복음의 그물을 던질 때 좋은 물고기와 나쁜 물고기를 함께 끌어 모은다. 그러나 주님은 자신의 것을 아신다.

**여섯째, 교회 안에 있으나 교회에 속하지 않은 위선자들의 경우는 예복을 입지 않은 손님으로 묘사된다.** 그리스도인이라는 고백을 하지 않는 것만이 아니라, 그 고백에 마음이 합하지 않은 자들도 구원에 이르지 못한다. 이 위선자에 대해 주목하라.

(1) 그의 발각, 곧 어떻게 드러났는가(마 22:11). 임금이 손님들을 보려고 들어오셨다. 하늘의 하나님은 종교를 고백하며 가시적 교회 안에 자리를 잡은 자들을 특별히 주목하신다. 우리 주 예수님은 금촛대들 사이를 걸으시며 그들의 행위를 아신다(계 2:1-2). 이 위선자가 예복이 없다는 것이 드러난 것은 임금 자신이 들어왔을 때였다. 주목하라. 위선자가 건전한 고백 안에 있는지 아닌지는 하나님의 권한이다. 우리는 종종 속는다. 그러나 그분은 속지 않으신다. 심판의 날이 위대한 발각의 날이 될 것이다. 모든 손님들이 왕 앞에 세워지는 그날, 그분은 귀한 것과 천한 것을 구분하실 것이다(마 25:32). 그때 우리가 어떻게 마음을 꿰뚫어 보시는 하나님의 날카로운 눈을 통과할지를 모든 손님들이 각자 준비해야 한다.

(2) 그의 재판(마 22:12). 그는 기소되었다(마 22:12). "친구여, 그대는 어찌하여 예복을 입지 않고 여기 들어왔는가?" 잔치를 안전하게 즐기고 있다고 자만하는 자에게 이것은 충격적인 말이다. "친구여!" 이것은 뼈를 찌르는 말이다. 겉으로만 친구, 자처하는 친구, 고백 면에서는 친구—수많은 의무와 책임 아래 친구로 묶인 자. 주목하라. 교회 안에 예수 그리스도의 거짓 친구들이 많다. 그들은 마음이 그분과 함께하지 않으면서도 그분을 사랑한다고 말한다. "어찌하여 여기 들어왔는가?" 임금은 그를 들여보낸 종들을 꾸짖지 않는다. 예복은 내면의 것이라 목사들은 자신의 인식 범위에 따라 판단해야 한다. 그러나 그는 그 사람이 마음이 올바르지 않은 줄 알면서 들어온 방자함을 책망한다. "어찌 감히 복음의 혜택을 받으려 하느냐, 복음의 규칙에는 전혀 관심이 없으면서?" 그는 입이 막혔다. 자신의 양심에 의해 납득되고 정죄되어 말문이 막혔다. 교회 안에서 살다가 그리스도 없이 죽는 자들은 심판의 큰 날 자신을 변호할 한마디도 하지 못할 것이다.

(3) 그의 선고(마 22:13). "저 사람의 손과 발을 묶어 바깥 어둠 속으로 내쫓아라." [1] 그는 포박당하도록 명령받았다. 제대로 행하고 걷지 않은 자들은 손발이 묶임을 당할 것이다. 심판 날에 위선자들은 묶인다. 천사들이 이 가라지들을 묶어 불사를 다발로 묶을 것이다(마 13:41). 정죄된 죄인들은 돌이킬 수 없는 선고로 묶인다. 그들은 형벌을 저항할 수도 피할 수도 없다. [2] 그는 혼인 잔치에서 쫓겨나도록 명령받았다. "저를 데려가라." 위선자의 악이 드러날 때, 그들은 신실한 자들의 교제에서 끊겨야 한다. 이것은 내세에서의 상실형을 뜻한다. 그들은 왕에게서, 나라로부터, 혼인 잔치에서 쫓겨날 것이다. "저주 받은 자들아, 내게서 떠나라." [3] 그는 음침한 감옥으로 던져지도록 명령받았다. "바깥 어둠 속으로 내쫓아라." 우리 주님은 여기서 자연스럽게 이 비유에서 그 비유가 가리키는 것, 곧 내세에서의 위선자들의 저주로 넘어가신다. 지옥은 바깥 어둠이니, 빛의 땅인 하늘로부터 분리된 어둠이다. 한 줄기 빛도, 소망의 불꽃도 없는 극도의 어둠이다. 주목하라. 위선자들은 복음의 빛 자체를 통해 더욱 아래인 바깥 어둠으로 내려가며, 그들에게 지옥은 참으로 지옥이니, 정죄함이 더욱 견딜 수 없다. "거기서 슬피 울며 이를 갈 것이다." 우리 주님은 이것을 지옥 고통의 묘사로 자주 사용하신다.

마지막으로, 이 비유는 우리가 이미 살펴본(마 20:16) 주목할 만한 말씀으로 마무리된다(마 22:14). "부름받은 사람은 많으나 택함받은 사람은 적다." 혼인 잔치에 부름받은 많은 이들 가운데, 그것을 대수롭지 않게 여기고 다른 것을 더 좋아하는 자들을 모두 제외하면, 그다음 신앙을 고백하면서도 그 영의 성품과 삶의 방식이 그 고백과 끊임없이 모순되는 자들을 제외하면, 택함받은 자들이 매우 적음을 알게 된다. 이것이 좁은 문이요 좁은 길이니, 찾는 사람이 적다.

---

원주석

1~46절 카드 ↗

M A T T H E W. CHAP. XXII. This chapter is a continuation of Christ's discourses in the temple, two or three days before he died. His discourses then are largely recorded, as being of special weight and consequence. In this chapter, we have, I. Instruction given, by the parable of the marriage-supper, concerning the rejection of the Jews, and the calling of the Gentiles ( Matthew 22:1-10 ), and, by the doom of the guest that had not the wedding-garment, the danger of hypocrisy in the profession of Christianity, Matthew 22:11-14 . II. Disputes with the Pharisees, Sadducees, and scribes, who opposed Christ, 1. Concerning paying tribute to Cæsar, Matthew 22:15-22 . 2. Concerning the resurrection of the dead, and the future state, Matthew 22:23-33 . 3. Concerning the great commandment of the law, Matthew 22:34-40 . 4. Concerning the relation of the Messiah to David, Matthew 22:41-46 . return to ' Top of Page ' <a name="verses-1-14" class="com-number"

Pericope (part_of)

절 (explains)

Source

마태복음 22장은 예수님께서 성전에서 행하신 가르침의 연속으로, 그분이 돌아가시기 이삼 일 전의 일이다. 이 장의 내용은 특별한 비중과 중요성을 지니기 때문에 상당히 자세하게 기록되어 있다. 이 장에서 우리는 다음을 살펴본다. 첫째, 혼인 잔치 비유를 통한 가르침이다. 유대인의 거절과 이방 사람의 부르심을 다루며(마 22:1-10), 예복을 입지 않은 손님의 심판을 통해 기독교 신앙 고백 안에서의 위선의 위험을 경고한다(마 22:11-14). 둘째, 바리새 사람과 사두개 사람과 율법사가 그리스도를 적대하며 벌인 논쟁이다. (1) 황제에게 세금을 바치는 문제(마 22:15-22), (2) 죽은 자의 부활과 내세에 관한 문제(마 22:23-33), (3) 율법의 가장 큰 계명에 관한 문제(마 22:34-40), (4) 메시아와 다윗의 관계에 관한 문제(마 22:41-46).

---

원주석

15~22절 카드 ↗

The Question Respecting Tribute. 15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk. 16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men. 17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? 18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? 19 show me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. 20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? 21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's. 22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him off with some pretence. In these verses, we have him attacked by the Pharisees and Herodians with a question about paying tribute to Cæsar. Observe, I. What the design was, which they proposed to themselves; They took counsel to entangle him in his talk. Hitherto, his encounters had been mostly with the chief priests and the elders, men in authority, who trusted more to their power than to their policy, and examined him concerning his commission ( Matthew 21:23 ; Matthew 21:23 ); but now he is set upon from another quarter; the Pharisees will try whether they can deal with him by their learning in the law, and in casuistical divinity, and they have a tentamen novum--a new trial for him. Note, It is in vain for the best and wisest of men to think that, by their ingenuity, or interest, or industry, or even by their innocence and integrity, they can escape the hatred and ill will of bad men, or screen themselves from the strife of tongues. See how unwearied the enemies of Christ and his kingdom are in their opposition! 1. They took counsel. It was foretold concerning him, that the rulers would take counsel against him ( Psalms 2:2 ); and so persecuted they the prophets. Come, and let us devise devices against Jeremiah. See Jeremiah 18:18 ; Jeremiah 20:10 . Note, The more there is of contrivance and consultation about sin, the worse it is. There is a particular woe to them that devise iniquity, Micah 2:1 . The more there is of the wicked wit in the contrivance of a sin, the more there is of the wicked will in the commission of it. 2. That which they aimed at was to entangle him in his talk. They saw him free and bold in speaking his mind, and hoped by that, if they could bring him to some nice and tender point, to get an advantage against him. It has been the old practice of Satan's agents and emissaries, to make a man an offender for a word, a word misplaced, or mistaken, or misunderstood; a word, though innocently designed, yet perverted by strained inuendos: thus they lay a snare for him that reproveth in the gate ( Isaiah 29:21 ), and represent the greatest teachers as the greatest troublers of Israel: thus the wicked plotteth against the just, Psalms 37:12 ; Psalms 37:13 . There are two ways by which the enemies of Christ might be revenged on him, and be rid of him; either by law or by force. By law they could not do it, unless they could make him obnoxious to the civil government; for it was not lawful for them to put any man to death ( John 18:31 ); and the Roman powers were not apt to concern themselves about questions of words, and names, and their law, Acts 18:15 . By force they could not do it, unless they could make him obnoxious to the people, who were always the hands, whoever were the heads, in such acts of violence, which they call the beating of the rebels; but the people took Christ for a Prophet, and therefore his enemies could not raise the mob against him. Now (as the old serpent was from the beginning more subtle than any beast of the field ), the design was, to bring him into such a dilemma, that he must make himself liable to the displeasure either of the Jewish multitude, or of the Roman magistrates; let him take which side of the question he will, he shall run himself into a premunire; and so they will gain their point, and make his own tongue to fall upon him. II. The question which they put to him pursuant to this design, Matthew 22:16 ; Matthew 22:17 . Having devised this iniquity in secret, in a close cabal, behind the curtain, when they went abroad without loss of time they practised it. Observe, 1. The persons they employed; they did not go themselves, lest the design should be suspected and Christ should stand the more upon his guard; but they sent their disciples, who would look less like tempters, and more like learners. Note, Wicked men will never want wicked instruments to be employed in carrying on their wicked counsels. Pharisees have their disciples at their beck, who will go any errand for them, and say as they say; and they have this in their eyes, when they are so industrious to make proselytes. With them they sent the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for a cheerful and entire subjection to the Roman emperor, and to Herod his deputy; and who made it their business to reconcile people to that government, and pressed all to pay their tribute. Some think that they were the collectors of the land tax, as the publicans were of the customs, and that they went with the Pharisees to Christ, with this blind upon their plot, that while the Herodians demanded the tax, and the Pharisees denied it, they were both willing to refer it to Christ, as a proper Judge to decide the quarrel. Herod being obliged, by the charter of the sovereignty, to take care of the tribute, these Herodians, by assisting him in that, helped to endear him to his great friends at Rome. The Pharisees, on the other hand, were zealous for the liberty of the Jews, and did what they could to make them impatient of the Roman yoke. Now, if he should countenance the paying of tribute, the Pharisees would incense the people against him; if he should discountenance or disallow it, the Herodians would incense the government against him. Note, It is common for those that oppose one another, to continue in an opposition to Christ and his kingdom. Samson's foxes looked several ways, but met in one firebrand. See Psalms 83:3 ; Psalms 83:5 ; Psalms 83:7 ; Psalms 83:8 . If they are unanimous in opposing, should not we be so in maintaining, the interests of the gospel? 2. The preface, with which they were plausibly to introduce the question; it was highly complimentary to our Saviour ( Matthew 22:16 ; Matthew 22:16 ); Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth. Note, It is a common thing for the most spiteful projects to be covered with the most specious pretences. Had they come to Christ with the most serious enquiry, and the most sincere intention, they could not have expressed themselves better. Here is hatred covered with deceit, and a wicked heart with burning lips ( Proverbs 26:23 ); as Judas, who kissed, and betrayed, as Joab, who kissed, and killed. Now, (1.) What they said of Christ was right, and whether they knew it or no, blessed be God, we know it. [1.] That Jesus Christ was a faithful Teacher; Thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth. For himself, he is true, the Amen, the faithful Witness; he is the Truth itself. As for his doctrine, the matter of his teaching was the way of God, the way that God requires us to walk in, the way of duty, that leads to happiness; that is the way of God. The manner of it was in truth; he showed people the right way, the way in which they should go. He was a skilful Teacher, and knew the way of God; and a faithful Teacher, that would be sure to let us know it. See Proverbs 8:6-9 . This is the character of a good teacher, to preach the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and not to suppress, pervert, or stretch, any truth, for favour or affection, hatred or good will, either out of a desire to please, or a fear to offend, any man. [2.] That he was a bold Reprover. In preaching, he cared not for any; he valued no man's frowns or smiles, he did not court, he did not dread, either the great or the many, for he regarded not the person of man. In his evangelical judgment, he did not know faces; that Lion of the tribe of Judah, turned not away for any ( Proverbs 30:30 ), turned not a step from the truth, nor from his work, for fear of the most formidable. He reproved with equity ( Matthew 11:4 ), and never with partiality. (2.) Though what they said was true for the matter of it, yet there was nothing but flattery and treachery in the intention of it. They called him Master, when they were contriving to treat him as the worst of malefactors; they pretended respect for him, when they intended mischief against him; and they affronted his wisdom as Man, much more his omniscience as God, of which he had so often given undeniable proofs, when they imagined that they could impose upon him with these pretences, and that he could not see through them. It is the grossest atheism, that is the greatest folly in the world, to think to put a cheat upon Christ, who searches the heart, Revelation 2:23 . Those that mock God do but deceive themselves. Galatians 6:7 . 3. The proposal of the case; What thinkest thou? As if they had said, "Many men are of many minds in this matter; it is a case which relates to practice, and occurs daily; let us have thy thought freely in the matter, Is it lawful to give tribute to Cæsar or not? " This implies a further question; Has Cæsar a right to demand it? The nation of the Jews was lately, about a hundred years before this, conquered by the Roman sword, and so, as other nations, made subject to the Roman yoke, and became a province of the empire; accordingly, toll, tribute, and custom, were demanded from them, and sometimes poll-money. By this it appeared that the sceptre was departed from Judah ( Genesis 49:10 ); and therefore, if they had understood the signs of the times, they must have concluded that Shiloh was come, and either that this was he, or they must find out another more likely to be so. Now the question was, Whether it was lawful to pay these taxes voluntarily, or, Whether they should not insist upon the ancient liberty of their nation, and rather suffer themselves to be distrained upon? The ground of the doubt was, that they were Abraham's seed, and should not by consent be in bondage to any man, John 8:33 . God had given them a law, that they should not set a stranger over them. Did not that imply, that they were not to yield any willing subjection to any prince, state, or potentate, that was not of their own nation and religion? This was an old mistake, arising from that pride and that haughty spirit which bring destruction and a fall. Jeremiah, in his time, though he spoke in God's name, could not possibly beat them off it, nor persuade them to submit to the king of Babylon; and their obstinacy in that matter was then their ruin ( Jeremiah 27:12 ; Jeremiah 27:13 ): and now again they stumbled at the same stone; and it was the very thing which, in a few years after, brought final destruction upon them by the Romans. They quite mistook the sense both of the precept and of the privilege, and, under colour of God's word, contended with his providence, when they should have kissed the rod, and accepted the punishment of their iniquity. However, by this question they hoped to entangle Christ, and, which way soever he resolved it, to expose him to the fury either of the jealous Jews, or of the jealous Romans; they were ready to triumph, as Pharaoh did over Israel, that the wilderness had shut him in, and his doctrine would be concluded either injurious to the rights of the church, or hurtful to kings and provinces. III. The breaking of this snare by the wisdom of the Lord Jesus. 1. He discovered it ( Matthew 22:18 ; Matthew 22:18 ); He perceived their wickedness; for, surely in vain is the net spread in the sight of any bird, Proverbs 1:17 . A temptation perceived is half conquered, for our greatest danger lies from snakes under the green grass; and he said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? Note, Whatever vizard the hypocrite puts on, our Lord Jesus sees through it; he perceives all the wickedness that is in the hearts of pretenders, and can easily convict them of it, and set it in order before them. He cannot be imposed upon, as we often are, by flatteries and fair pretences. He that searches the heart can call hypocrites by their own name, as Ahijah did the wife of Jeroboam ( 1 Kings 14:6 ), Why feignest thou thyself to be another? Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? Note, Hypocrites tempt Jesus Christ; they try his knowledge, whether he can discover them through their disguises; they try his holiness and truth, whether he will allow of them in this church; but if they that of old tempted Christ, when he was but darkly revealed, were destroyed of serpents, of how much sorer punishment shall they be thought worthy who tempt him now in the midst of gospel light and love! Those that presume to tempt Christ will certainly find him too hard for them, and that he is of more piercing eyes than not to see, and more pure eyes than not to hate, the disguised wickedness of hypocrites, that dig deep to hide their counsel from him. 2. He evaded it; his convicting them of hypocrisy might have served for an answer (such captious malicious questions deserve a reproof, not a reply): but our Lord Jesus gave a full answer to their question, and introduced it by an argument sufficient to support it, so as to lay down a rule for his church in this matter, and yet to avoid giving offence, and to break the snare. (1.) He forced them, ere they were aware, to confess Cæsar's authority over them, Matthew 22:19 ; Matthew 22:20 . In dealing with those that are captious, it is good to give our reasons, and, if possible, reasons of confessed cogency, before we give our resolutions. Thus the evidence of truth may silence gainsayers by surprise, while they only stood upon their guard against the truth itself, not against the reason of it; Show me the tribute-money. He had none of his own to convince them by; it should seem, he had not so much as one piece of money about him, for for our sakes he emptied himself, and became poor; he despised the wealth of this world, and thereby taught us not to over-value it; silver and gold he had none; why then should we covet to load ourselves with the thick clay? The Romans demanded their tribute in their own money, which was current among the Jews at that time: that therefore is called the tribute-money; he does not name what piece but the tribute money, to show that he did not mind things of that nature, nor concern himself about them; his heart was upon better things, the kingdom of God and the riches and righteousness thereof, and ours should be so too. They presently brought him a penny, a Roman penny in silver, in value about sevenpence half-penny of our money, the most common piece then in use: it was stamped with the emperor's image and superscription, which was the warrant of the public faith for the value of the pieces so stamped; a method agreed on by most nations, for the more easy circulation of money with satisfaction. The coining of money has always been looked upon as a branch of the prerogative, a flower of the crown, a royalty belonging to the sovereign powers; and the admitting of that as the good and lawful money of a country is an implicit submission to those powers, and an owning of them in money matters. How happy is our constitution, and how happy we, who live in a nation where, though the image and superscription be the sovereign's, the property is the subject's, under the protection of the laws, and what we have we can call our own! Christ asked them, Whose image is this? They owned it to be Cæsar's, and thereby convicted those of falsehood who said, We were never in bondage to any; and confirmed what afterward they said, We have no king but Cæsar. It is a rule in the Jewish Talmud, that "he is the king of the country whose coin is current in the country." Some think that the superscription upon this coin was a memorandum of the conquest of Judea by the Romans, anno post captam Judæam--the year after that event; and that they admitted that too. (2.) From thence he inferred the lawfulness of paying tribute to Cæsar ( Matthew 22:21 ; Matthew 22:21 ); Render therefore to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's; not, " Give it him" (as they expressed it, Matthew 22:17 ; Matthew 22:17 ), but, " Render it; Return," or "Restore it; if Cæsar fill the purses, let Cæsar command them. It is too late now to dispute paying tribute to Cæsar; for you are become a province of the empire, and, when once a relation is admitted, the duty of it must be performed. Render to all their due, and particularly tribute to whom tribute is due. " Now by this answer, [1.] No offence was given. It was much to the honour of Christ and his doctrine, that he did not interpose as a Judge or a Divider in matters of this nature, but left them as he found them, for his kingdom is not of this world; and in this he hath given an example to his ministers, who deal in sacred things, not to meddle with disputes about things secular, not to wade far into controversies relating to them, but to leave that to those whose proper business it is. Ministers that would mind their business, and please their master, must not entangle themselves in the affairs of this life: they forfeit the guidance of God's Spirit, and the convoy of his providence when they thus to out of their way. Christ discusses not the emperor's title, but enjoins a peaceable subjection to the powers that be. The government therefore had no reason to take offence at his determination, but to thank him, for it would strengthen Cæsar's interest with the people, who held him for a Prophet; and yet such was the impudence of his prosecutors, that, though he had expressly charged them to render to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's, they laid the direct contrary in his indictment, that he forbade to give tribute to Cæsar, Luke 23:2 . As to the people, the Pharisees could not accuse him to them, because they themselves had, before they were aware, yielded the premises, and then it was too late to evade the conclusion. Note, Though truth seeks not a fraudulent concealment, yet it sometimes needs a prudent management, to prevent the offence which may be taken at it. [2.] His adversaries were reproved. First, Some of them would have had him make it unlawful to give tribute to Cæsar, that they might have a pretence to save their money. Thus many excuse themselves from that which they must do, by arguing whether they may do it or no. Secondly, They all withheld from God his dues, and are reproved for that: while they were vainly contending about their civil liberties, they had lost the life and power of religion, and needed to be put in mind of their duty to God, with that to Cæsar. [3.] His disciples were instructed, and standing rules left to the church. First, That the Christian religion is no enemy to civil government, but a friend to it. Christ's kingdom doth not clash or interfere with the kingdoms of the earth, in any thing that pertains to their jurisdiction. By Christ kings reign. Secondly, It is the duty of subjects to render to magistrates that which, according to the laws of their country, is their due. The higher powers, being entrusted with the public welfare, the protection of the subject, and the conservation of the peace, are entitled, in consideration thereof, to a just proportion of the public wealth, and the revenue of the nation. For this cause pay we tribute, because they attend continually to this very thing ( Romans 13:6 ); and it is doubtless a greater sin to cheat the government than to cheat a private person. Though it is the constitution that determines what is Cæsar's, yet, when that is determined, Christ bids us render it to him; my coat is my coat, by the law of man; but he is a thief, by the law of God, that takes it from me. Thirdly, When we render to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's, we must remember withal to render to God the things that are God's. If our purses be Cæsar's, our consciences are God's; he hath said, My son, give me thy heart: he must have the innermost and uppermost place there; we must render to God that which is his due, out of our time and out of our estates; from them he must have his share as well as Cæsar his; and if Cæsar's commands interfere with God's we must obey God rather than men. Lastly, Observe how they were nonplussed by this answer; they marvelled, and left him, and went their way, Matthew 22:22 ; Matthew 22:22 . They admired his sagacity in discovering and evading a snare which they thought so craftily laid. Christ is, and will be, the Wonder, not only of his beloved friends, but of his baffled enemies. One would think they should have marvelled and followed him, marvelled and submitted to him; no, they marvelled and left him. Note, There are many in whose eyes Christ is marvellous, and yet not precious. They admire his wisdom, but will not be guided by it, his power, but will not submit to it. They went their way, as persons ashamed, and made an inglorious retreat. The stratagem being defeated, they quitted the field. Note, There is nothing got by contending with Christ. return to ' Top of Page ' <a name="verses-23-33" class="com-number"

Pericope (part_of)

절 (explains)

bible-text/mat-22-15, bible-text/mat-22-16, bible-text/mat-22-17, bible-text/mat-22-18, bible-text/mat-22-19, bible-text/mat-22-20, bible-text/mat-22-21, bible-text/mat-22-22

Source

> 그때에 바리새 사람들이 가서, 어떻게 하면 예수의 말씀을 빌미로 그를 함정에 빠뜨릴까 의논하였다. 그들은 자기 제자들을 헤롯 당원들과 함께 예수께 보내어 말하게 하였다. "선생님, 우리는 당신이 진실하시며 하나님의 길을 참되게 가르치시는 줄 압니다. 또 당신은 사람을 외모로 차별하지 않으시므로 누구에게도 매이지 않으십니다. 그러니 우리에게 말씀해 주십시오. 어떻게 생각하십니까? 황제에게 세금을 바치는 것이 옳습니까, 옳지 않습니까?" 그러나 예수께서는 그들의 악함을 아시고 말씀하셨다. "위선자들아, 어찌하여 나를 시험하느냐? 세금 낼 돈을 내게 보여라." 그들이 데나리온 하나를 가져왔다. 예수께서 그들에게 물으셨다. "이 형상과 글자가 누구의 것이냐?" 그들이 "황제의 것입니다" 하고 대답하니, 예수께서 그들에게 말씀하셨다. "그러므로 황제의 것은 황제에게, 하나님의 것은 하나님께 바쳐라." 그들은 이 말씀을 듣고 놀라 예수를 떠나 가버렸다. (마 22:15-22)

이 단락에서 우리는 바리새 사람들과 헤롯 당원들이 황제에게 세금 바치는 문제로 예수님을 공격하는 것을 살펴본다.

**첫째, 그들이 품은 의도가 무엇이었는지를 살펴본다.** 그들이 품은 의도는 그분의 말씀을 빌미로 그를 함정에 빠뜨리는 것이었다. 지금까지 예수님을 만난 것은 주로 대제사장들과 장로들이었는데(마 21:23), 이번에는 다른 쪽에서 그를 공격한다. 바리새 사람들이 율법과 법해석 학문으로 그를 다루어 볼 것이다. 주목하라. 재능이나 영향력이나 노력으로, 심지어 결백함과 올바름으로도 악한 자들의 증오와 적의를 피하거나 비방으로부터 자신을 지킬 수 없다. 그리스도의 원수들이 얼마나 지치지 않고 반대하는지를 보라. 그들은 의논하였다. 그가 두 가지 딜레마에 빠지도록 고안하였다. 한쪽을 택하면 유대 백성의 분노를 사게 되고, 다른 쪽을 택하면 로마 통치자의 분노를 사게 된다.

**둘째, 그들이 이 의도에 따라 내놓은 질문을 살펴본다(마 22:16-17).** (1) 그들이 사용한 사람들을 보라. 그들 자신이 직접 가지 않고—그러면 의도가 들킬 것이기에—자기 제자들을 보냈다. 주목하라. 악한 자들은 악한 계획을 이행할 악한 도구를 항상 찾아낸다. 그들과 함께 헤롯 당원들도 보냈다. 이들은 로마 황제의 통치와 그의 대리인 헤롯에게 기꺼이 복종하려는 유대인 당파였다. 바리새 사람들은 유대인의 자유에 열심이었고, 헤롯 당원들은 로마의 권위를 지지하였다. 삼손의 여우들은 서로 반대 방향을 보았지만, 하나의 횃불로 만났다(삿 15:4 참조). 그리스도와 그 나라에 반대하면서 서로 하나가 된다면, 복음을 옹호하는 일에서는 우리가 하나가 되어야 하지 않겠는가? (2) 그들이 질문을 도입하는 방식을 보라. 이것은 우리 주님께 극도로 아첨하는 것이었다(마 22:16). "선생님, 우리는 당신이 진실하시며 하나님의 길을 참되게 가르치시는 줄 압니다." 주목하라. 가장 흉악한 계획이 가장 그럴듯한 외모로 덮이는 것은 흔한 일이다. [1] 그들이 그리스도에 대해 말한 것은 옳다. 그분은 참되시고, 신실한 증인이시며, 진리 자체이시다. 그분의 가르침은 하나님의 길이었다. 그분은 능숙한 교사이셨고 신실한 교사이셨다. [2] 그분은 담대한 책망자이셨다. 가르치실 때 그분은 누구도 개의치 않으셨다. 위인들의 찌푸림도 대중의 환심도 구하지 않으셨다. 공의로 판단하셨고 결코 편파적으로 하지 않으셨다. 그러나 (2) 그들이 말한 것은 옳은 내용이었지만, 그 의도는 아첨과 배신뿐이었다. 그들은 그를 선생님이라 부르면서 그를 가장 악한 범죄자로 다루려 하였다. (3) 문제의 제기를 보라. "황제에게 세금을 바치는 것이 옳습니까, 옳지 않습니까?" 이 질문이 내포하는 것은, 황제에게 그것을 요구할 권리가 있는가이다. 그들이 기대했던 것은, 어느 쪽으로 답하든 그를 유대 무리의 분노에 넘기거나 로마 통치자의 분노에 넘기는 것이었다. 마치 파라오가 이스라엘을 보며 광야가 그들을 막았다고 한 것처럼, 그들은 그분의 가르침이 교회의 권리에 해롭거나 왕들과 지방들에 해롭다는 결론을 내릴 수 있다고 생각하였다.

**셋째, 주 예수님의 지혜로 이 올무가 깨어지는 것을 살펴본다.** (1) 그분이 올무를 발견하셨다(마 22:18). "예수께서는 그들의 악함을 아시고" 말씀하셨다. 하늘을 향해 뻗은 그물은 반드시 보이게 마련이니(잠 1:17을 참조), 인식된 유혹은 절반쯤 극복된 것이다. "위선자들아, 어찌하여 나를 시험하느냐?" 주목하라. 위선자가 어떤 가면을 쓰든, 우리 주 예수님은 그것을 꿰뚫어 보신다. 그분은 아첨꾼들과 그럴듯한 구실 뒤에 있는 모든 악함을 지각하시고 쉽게 드러내신다. 그분은 우리처럼 자주 겉모습에 속지 않으신다. 마음을 살피시는 그분은 위선자들을 이름을 불러 꾸짖으실 수 있다. (2) 그분이 올무에서 벗어나셨다. 그분이 그들을 위선자로 납득시키신 것만으로도 충분한 대답이 될 수 있었다. 그러나 우리 주 예수님은 질문에 완전한 대답을 주시되, 그들이 깨닫기 전에 스스로 황제의 권위를 인정하게 만드는 논거를 제시하시며, 그 논거로 대답을 뒷받침하셨다.

먼저 그분은 그들이 알기도 전에 황제의 권위를 스스로 고백하게 하셨다(마 22:19-20). 논쟁적인 자들을 다룰 때는 자신의 결론보다 먼저 이유를 주되, 가능하면 인정되는 논거를 앞세우는 것이 좋다. "세금 낼 돈을 내게 보여라." 그분은 자신의 돈이 없었다. 그분은 우리를 위해 스스로 비워 가난하게 되셨고, 이 세상의 재물을 가볍게 여기셨다. 로마인들은 자기들 돈으로 세금을 요구하였는데, 그 돈이 그 당시 유대인들 사이에서 통용되고 있었다. 그래서 세금 내는 돈이라 불렸다. 그들이 즉시 데나리온 하나를 가져왔다. 로마의 은화로 우리 돈으로는 약 십 센트 정도의 가치를 지닌 가장 흔한 동전이었다. 황제의 형상과 글자가 새겨져 있었으니, 이것은 그 화폐의 가치를 보증하는 국가 신용의 담보였다. 화폐 발행권은 주권의 한 가지, 왕관의 꽃이요 군주 권력에 속한 권한으로 항상 여겨졌다. 그것을 통용 화폐로 인정하는 것은 그 권력에 대한 묵시적 복종이다. 그리스도께서 "이 형상이 누구의 것이냐?"고 물으시자 그들이 황제의 것이라고 인정하였다. 그리하여 "우리는 결코 누구에게도 종 노릇 한 적이 없다"(요 8:33)고 말했던 자들의 거짓을 그들 자신이 드러냈다.

그다음 그분은 거기서 황제에게 세금을 바치는 것이 합법적이라는 결론을 이끌어 내셨다(마 22:21). "그러므로 황제의 것은 황제에게 바쳐라." 이미 너희는 제국의 한 지방이 되었으니, 일단 관계가 인정된 이상 그 관계에 따른 의무를 이행해야 한다. 이 대답으로 [1] 어떤 이에게도 상처를 주지 않았다. 그리스도의 가르침이 이런 문제에 재판관이나 나누는 자로 개입하지 않고 그것들을 찾아온 대로 두는 것은 그분과 그 가르침의 큰 명예이다. 그분의 나라는 이 세상 나라가 아니기 때문이다. 이것은 그분의 목사들에게도 본이 된다. 거룩한 일을 다루는 그들은 세상 일에 관한 논쟁에 깊이 개입하지 말아야 하며, 그것은 합당히 맡겨진 자들에게 남겨야 한다. [2] 그의 대적들은 책망을 받았다. 어떤 이들은 황제에게 세금 바치는 것을 불법으로 삼아 돈을 아끼려 하였다. 또 그들 모두 하나님께 드릴 것을 드리지 않고 있었다. 시민적 자유에 대해 헛되이 다투는 동안 그들은 종교의 생명과 능력을 잃어버렸다. [3] 그분의 제자들은 가르침을 받았고 교회에는 항구적인 규칙이 남겨졌다. 첫째, 기독교는 시민 정부의 원수가 아니라 친구이다. 둘째, 백성들은 나라의 법에 따라 그것이 그들의 당연한 것인 한 통치자들에게 그것을 바칠 의무가 있다. 더 높은 권세는 공공 복지와 백성의 보호와 평화 유지를 맡기 때문에, 그에 합당한 몫의 국가 재원을 받을 권리가 있다. 셋째, 황제의 것을 황제에게 바칠 때, 우리는 또한 하나님의 것을 하나님께 바치는 것을 기억해야 한다. 우리의 지갑이 황제의 것이라면, 우리의 양심은 하나님의 것이다. 우리 마음 가장 안쪽과 가장 높은 자리는 그분의 것이어야 한다. 황제의 명령이 하나님의 명령과 충돌하면, 사람보다 하나님을 순종해야 한다.

마지막으로, 그들이 이 대답에 어리둥절해진 것을 보라(마 22:22). "그들은 이 말씀을 듣고 놀라 예수를 떠나 가버렸다." 그들은 이렇게 교묘하게 놓인 덫을 그분이 이토록 지혜롭게 발견하고 벗어나신 것에 놀랐다. 그리스도는 그 친애하는 친구들만이 아니라 패배한 원수들에게도 놀라움이시다. 그들이 놀라고 그분을 따라야 했건만, 놀라고 그분께 복종해야 했건만, 그들은 놀라고 그분을 떠났다. 주목하라. 그리스도가 경이롭게 보이는 눈을 가진 자들이 많으나 그분이 귀한 분으로 여겨지지 않는 경우가 있다. 그들은 수치를 당한 자들처럼 가버렸다. 전략이 실패하자 전장을 떠난 것이다. 주목하라. 그리스도와 다투어 얻는 것은 없다.

---

원주석

23~33절 카드 ↗

The Question Respecting Marriage. 23 The same day came to him the Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection, and asked him, 24 Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother. 25 Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no issue, left his wife unto his brother: 26 Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh. 27 And last of all the woman died also. 28 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her. 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. 31 But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, 32 I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. 33 And when the multitude heard this, they were astonished at his doctrine. We have here Christ's dispute with the Sadducees concerning the resurrection; it was the same day on which he was attacked by the Pharisees about paying tribute. Satan was now more busy than ever to ruffle and disturb him; it was an hour of temptation, Revelation 3:10 . The truth as it is in Jesus will still meet with contradiction, in some branch or other of it. Observe here, I. The opposition which the Sadducees made to a very great truth of religion; they say, There is no resurrection, as there are some fools who say, There is no God. These heretics were called Sadducees from one Sadoc, a disciple of Antigonus Sochæus, who flourished about two hundred and eighty-four years before our Saviour's birth. They lie under heavy censures among the writers of their own nation, as men of base and debauched conversations, which their principles led them to. They were the fewest in number of all the sects among the Jews, but generally persons of some rank. As the Pharisees and Essenes seemed to follow Plato and Pythagoras, so the Sadducees were much of the genius of the Epicureans; they denied the resurrection, they said, There is no future state, no life after this; that, when the body dies, the soul is annihilated, and dies with it; that there is no state of rewards or punishments in the other world; no judgment to come in heaven or hell. They maintained, that, except God, there is not spirit ( Acts 23:8 ), nothing but matter and motion. They would not own the divine inspiration of the prophets, nor any revelation from heaven, but what God himself spoke upon mount Sinai. Now the doctrine of Christ carried that great truth of the resurrection and a future state much further than it had yet been revealed, and therefore the Sadducees in a particular manner set themselves against it. The Pharisees and Sadducees were contrary to each other, and yet confederates against Christ. Christ's gospel hath always suffered between superstitious ceremonious hypocrites and bigots on the one hand, and profane deists and infidels on the other. The former abusing, the latter despising, the form of godliness, but both denying the power of it. II. The objection they made against the truth, which was taken from a supposed case of a woman that had seven husbands successively; now they take it for granted, that, if there be a resurrection, it must be a return to such a state as this we are now in, and to the same circumstances, like the imaginary Platonic year; and if so, it is an invincible absurdity for this woman in the future state to have seven husbands, or else an insuperable difficulty which of them should have her, he whom she had first, or he whom she had last, or he whom she loved best, or he whom she lived longest with. 1. They suggest the law of Moses in this matter ( Matthew 22:24 ; Matthew 22:24 ), that the next of kin should marry the widow of him that died childless ( Deuteronomy 25:5 ); we have it practised Ruth 4:5 . It was a political law, founded in the particular constitution of the Jewish commonwealth, to preserve the distinction of families and inheritances, of both which there was special care taken in that government. 2. They put a case upon this statute, which, whether it were a case in fact or only a moot case, is not at all material; if it had not really occurred, yet possibly it might. It was of seven brothers, who married the same woman, Matthew 22:25-27 ; Matthew 22:25-27 . Now this case supposes, (1.) The desolations that death sometimes makes in families when it comes with commission; how it often sweeps away a whole fraternity in a little time;: seldom (as the case is put) according to seniority (the land of darkness is without any order,) but heaps upon heaps; it diminishes families that had multiplied greatly, Psalms 107:38 ; Psalms 107:39 . When there were seven brothers grown up to man's estate, there was a family very likely to be built up; and yet this numerous family leaves neither son nor nephew, nor any remaining in their dwellings, Job 18:19 . Well may we say then, Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it. Let none be sure of the advancement and perpetuity of their names and families, unless they could make a covenant of peace with death, or be at an agreement with the grave. (2.) The obedience of these seven brothers to the law, though they had a power of refusal under the penalty of a reproach, Deuteronomy 25:7 . Note, Discouraging providences should not keep us from doing our duty because we must be governed by the rule, not by the event. The seventh, who ventured last to marry the widow (many a one would say) was a bold man. I would say, if he did it purely in obedience to God, he was a good man, and one that made conscience of his duty. But, last of all, the woman died also. Note, Survivorship is but a reprieve; they that live long, and bury their relations and neighbours one after another, do not thereby acquire an immortality; no, their day will come to fall. Death's bitter cup goes round, and, sooner or later, we must all pledge in it, Jeremiah 25:26 . 3. They propose a doubt upon this case ( Matthew 22:28 ; Matthew 22:28 ); " In the resurrection, whose wife shall she be of the seven? You cannot tell whose; and therefore we must conclude there is no resurrection. " The Pharisees, who professed to believe a resurrection, had very gross and carnal notions concerning it, and concerning the future state; expecting to find there, as the Turks in their paradise, the delights and pleasures of the animal life, which perhaps drove the Sadducees to deny the thing itself; for nothing gives greater advantage to atheism and infidelity than the carnality of those that make religion, either in its professions or in its prospects, a servant to their sensual appetites and secular interests; while those that are erroneous deny the truth, those that are superstitious betray it to them. Now they, in this objection, went upon the Pharisees' hypothesis. Note, It is not strange that carnal minds have very false notions of spiritual and eternal things. The natural man receiveth not these things, for they are foolishness to him. 1 Corinthians 2:14 . Let truth be set in a clear light, and then it appears in its full strength. III. Christ's answer to this objection; by reproving their ignorance, and rectifying their mistake, he shows the objection to be fallacious and unconcluding. 1. He reproves their ignorance ( Matthew 22:29 ; Matthew 22:29 ); Ye do err. Note, Those do greatly err, in the judgment of Christ, who deny the resurrection and a future state. Here Christ reproves with the meekness of wisdom, and is not so sharp upon them (whatever was the reason) as sometimes he was upon the chief priests and elders; Ye do err, not knowing. Note, Ignorance is the cause of error; those that are in the dark, miss their way. The patrons of error do therefore resist the light, and do what they can to take away the key of knowledge; Ye do err in this matter, not knowing. Note, Ignorance is the cause of error about the resurrection and the future state. What it is in its particular instances, the wisest and best know not; it doth not yet appear what we shall be, it is a glory that is to be revealed: when we speak of the state of separate souls, the resurrection of the body, and of eternal happiness and misery, we are soon at a loss; we cannot order our speech, by reason of darkness, but that it is a thing about which we are not left in the dark; blessed be God, we are not; and those who deny it are guilty of a willing and affected ignorance. It seems, there were some Sadducees, some such monsters, among professing Christians, some among you, that say, There is no resurrection of the dead ( 1 Corinthians 15:12 ) and some that did in effect deny it, by turning it into an allegory, saying, The resurrection is past already. Now observe, (1.) They know not the power of God; which would lead men to infer that there may be a resurrection and a future state. Note, The ignorance, disbelief, or weak belief, of God's power, is at the bottom of many errors, particularly theirs who deny the resurrection. When we are told of the soul's existence and agency in a state of separation from the body, and especially that a dead body, which had lain many ages in the grave, and is turned into common and indistinguished dust, that this shall be raised the same body that it was, and live, move, and act, again; we are ready to say, How can these things be? Nature allows it for a maxim, A privatione ad habitum non datur regressus--The habits attaching to a state of existence vanish irrecoverably with the state itself. If a man die, shall he live again? And vain men, because they cannot comprehend the way of it, question the truth of it; whereas, if we firmly believe in God the Father Almighty, that nothing is impossible with God, all these difficulties vanish. This therefore we must fasten upon, in the first place, that God is omnipotent, and can do what he will; and then no room is left for doubting but that he will do what he has promised; and, if so, why should it be thought a thing incredible with you that God should raise the dead? Acts 26:8 . His power far exceeds the power of nature. (2.) They know not the scriptures, which decidedly affirm that there shall be a resurrection and a future state. The power of God, determined and engaged by his promise, is the foundation for faith to build upon. Now the scriptures speak plainly, that the soul is immortal, and there is another life after this; it is the scope both of the law and of the prophets, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and of the unjust, Acts 24:14 ; Acts 24:15 . Job knew it ( Job 19:26 ), Ezekiel foresaw it ( Ezekiel 37:1-28 ), and Daniel plainly foretold it, Daniel 12:2 . Christ rose again according to the scriptures ( 1 Corinthians 15:3 ); and so shall we. Those therefore who deny it, either have not conversed with the Scriptures, or do not believe them, or do not take the true sense and meaning of them. Note, Ignorance of the scripture is the rise of abundance of mischief. 2. He rectifies their mistake, and ( Matthew 22:30 ; Matthew 22:30 ) corrects those gross ideas which they had of the resurrection and a future state, and fixes these doctrines upon a true and lasting basis. Concerning that state, observe, (1.) It is not like the state we are now in upon earth; They neither marry, nor are given in marriage. In our present state marriage is necessary; it was instituted in innocency; whatever intermission or neglect there has been of other institutions, this was never laid aside, nor will be till the end of time. In the old world, they were marrying, and giving in marriage; the Jews in Babylon, when cut off from other ordinances, yet were bid to take them wives, Jeremiah 29:6 . All civilized nations have had a sense of the obligation of the marriage covenant; and it is requisite for the gratifying of the desires, and recruiting the deficiencies, of the human nature. But, in the resurrection, there is no occasion for marriage; whether in glorified bodies there will be any distinction of sexes some too curiously dispute (the ancients are divided in their opinions about it); but, whether there will be a distinction or not, it is certain that there will be no conjunction; where God will be all in all, there needs no other meet-help; the body will be spiritual, and there will be in it no carnal desires to be gratified: when the mystical body is completed, there will be no further occasion to seek a godly seed, which was one end of the institution of marriage, Malachi 2:15 . In heaven there will be no decay of the individuals, and therefore no eating and drinking; no decay of the species, and therefore no marrying; where there shall be no more deaths ( Revelation 21:4 ), there need be no more births. The married state is a composition of joys and cares; those that enter upon it are taught to look upon it as subject to changes, richer and poorer, sickness and health; and therefore it is fit for this mixed, changing world; but as in hell, where there is no joy, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride shall be heard no more at all, so in heaven, where there is all joy, and no care or pain or trouble, there will be no marrying. The joys of that state are pure and spiritual, and arise from the marriage of all of them to the Lamb, not of any of them to one another. (2.) It is like the state angels are now in in heaven; They are as the angels of God in heaven; they are so, that is, undoubtedly they shall be so. They are so already in Christ their Head, who has made them sit with him in heavenly places, Ephesians 2:6 . The spirits of just men already made perfect are of the same corporation with the innumerable company of angels, Hebrews 12:22 ; Hebrews 12:23 . Man in his creation was made a little lower than the angels ( Psalms 8:5 ); but in his complete redemption and renovation will be as the angels; pure and spiritual as the angels, knowing and loving as those blessed seraphim, ever praising God like them and with them. The bodies of the saints shall be raised incorruptible and glorious, like the uncompounded vehicles of those pure and holy spirits ( 1 Corinthians 15:42 , c.), swift and strong, like them. We should therefore desire and endeavour to do the will of God now as the angels do it in heaven, because we hope shortly to be like the angels who always behold our Father's face. He saith nothing of the state of the wicked in the resurrection but, by consequence, they shall be like the devils, whose lusts they have done. IV. Christ's argument to confirm this great truth of the resurrection and a future state; the matters being of great concern, he did not think it enough (as in some other disputes) to discover the fallacy and sophistry of the objection, but backed the truth with a solid argument; for Christ brings forth judgment to truth as well as victory, and enables his followers to give a reason of the hope that is in them. Now observe, 1. Whence he fetched his argument--from the scripture; that is the great magazine or armoury whence we may be furnished with spiritual weapons, offensive and defensive. It is written is Goliath's sword. Have ye not read that which was spoken to you by God? Note, (1.) What the scripture speaks God speaks. (2.) What was spoken to Moses was spoken to us; it was spoken and written for our learning. (3.) It concerns us to read and hear what God hath spoken, because it is spoken to us. It was spoken to you Jews in the first place, for to them were committed the oracles of God. The argument is fetched from the books of Moses, because the Sadducees received them only, as some think, or, at least, them chiefly, for canonical scriptures; Christ therefore fetched his proof from the most indisputable fountain. The latter prophets have more express proofs of a future state than the law of Moses has; for though the law of Moses supposes the immortality of the soul and a future state, as principles of what is called natural religion, yet no express revelation of it is made by the law of Moses; because so much of that law was peculiar to that people, and was therefore guarded as municipal laws used to be with temporal promises and threatenings, and the more express revelation of a future state was reserved for the latter days; but our Saviour finds a very solid argument for the resurrection even in the writings of Moses. Much scripture lies under ground, that must be digged for. 2. What his argument was ( Matthew 22:32 ; Matthew 22:32 ); I am the God of Abraham. This was not an express proof, totidem verbis--in so many words; and yet it was really a conclusive argument. Consequences from scripture, if rightly deduced, must be received as scripture; for it was written for those that have the use of reason. Now the drift of the argument is to prove, (1.) That there is a future state, another life after this, in which the righteous shall be truly and constantly happy. This is proved from what God said; I am the God of Abraham. [1.] For God to be any one's God supposes some very extraordinary privilege and happiness; unless we know fully what God is, we could not comprehend the riches of that word, I will be to thee a God, that is, a Benefactor like myself. The God of Israel is a God to Israel ( 1 Chronicles 17:24 ), a spiritual Benefactor; for he is the Father of spirits, and blesseth with spiritual blessings: it is to be an all-sufficient Benefactor, a God that is enough, a complete Good, and an eternal Benefactor; for he is himself an everlasting God, and will be to those that are in covenant with him an everlasting Good. This great word God had often said to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; and it was intended as a recompence for their singular faith and obedience, in quitting the country at God's call. The Jews had a profound veneration for those three patriarchs, and would extend the promise God made them to the uttermost. [2.] It is manifest that these good men had no such extraordinary happiness, in this life, as might look any thing like the accomplishment of so great a word as that. They were strangers in the land of promise, wandering, pinched with famine; they had not a foot of ground of their own but a burying-place, which directed them to look for something beyond this life. In present enjoyments they came far short of their neighbours that were strangers to this covenant. What was there in this world to distinguish them and the heirs of their faith from other people, any whit proportionable to the dignity and distinction of this covenant? If no happiness had been reserved for these great and good men on the other side of death, that melancholy word of poor Jacob's, when he was old ( Genesis 47:9 ), Few and evil have the days of the years of my life been, would have been an eternal reproach to the wisdom, goodness, and faithfulness, of that God who had so often called himself the God of Jacob. [3.] Therefore there must certainly be a future state, in which, as God will ever live to be eternally rewarding, so Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, will ever live to be eternally rewarded. That of the apostle ( Hebrews 11:16 ), is a key to this argument, where, when he had been speaking of the faith and obedience of the patriarchs in the land of their pilgrimage, he adds, Wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; because he has provided for them a city, a heavenly city; implying, that if he had not provided so well for them in the other world, considering how they sped in this, he would have been ashamed to have called himself their God; but now he is not, having done that for them which answers it in its true intent and full extent. (2.) That the soul is immortal, and the body shall rise again, to be united; if the former point be gained, these will follow; but they are likewise proved by considering the time when God spoke this; it was to Moses at the bush, long after Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, were dead and buried; and yet God saith, not, " I was, " or " have been, " but I am the God of Abraham. Now God is not God of the dead, but of the living. He is a living God, and communicates vital influences to those to whom he is a God. If, when Abraham died, there had been an end of him, there had been an end likewise of God's relation to him as his God; but at that time, when God spoke to Moses, he was the God of Abraham, and therefore Abraham must be then alive; which proves the immortality of the soul in a state of bliss; and that, by consequence, infers the resurrection of the body; for there is such an inclination in the human soul to its body, as would make a final and eternal separation inconsistent with the bliss of those that have God for their God. The Sadducees' notion was, that the union between body and soul is so close, that, when the body dies, the soul dies with it. Now, upon the same hypothesis, if the soul lives, as it certainly does, the body must some time or other live with it. And besides, the Lord is for the body, it is an essential part of the man; there is a covenant with the dust, which will be remembered, otherwise the man would not be happy. The charge which the dying patriarchs gave concerning their bones, and that in faith, was an evidence that they had some expectation of the resurrection of their bodies. But this doctrine was reserved for a more full revelation after the resurrection of Christ, who was the first-fruits of them that slept. Lastly, We have the issue of this dispute. The Sadducees were put to silence ( Matthew 22:34 ; Matthew 22:34 ), and so put to shame. They thought by their subtlety to put Christ to shame, when they were preparing shame for themselves. But the multitude were astonished at this doctrine, Matthew 22:33 ; Matthew 22:33 . 1. Because it was new to them. See to what a sad pass the exposition of scripture was come among them, when people were astonished at it as a miracle to hear the fundamental promise applied to this great truth; they had sorry scribes, or this had been no news to them. 2. Because it had something in it very good and great. Truth often shows the brighter, and is the more admired, for its being opposed. Observe, Many gainsayers are silenced, and many hearers astonished, without being savingly converted; yet even in the silence and astonishment of unsanctified souls God magnifies his law, magnifies his gospel, and makes both honourable. return to ' Top of Page ' <a name="verses-34-40" class="com-number"

Pericope (part_of)

절 (explains)

bible-text/mat-22-23, bible-text/mat-22-24, bible-text/mat-22-25, bible-text/mat-22-26, bible-text/mat-22-27, bible-text/mat-22-28, bible-text/mat-22-29, bible-text/mat-22-30, bible-text/mat-22-31, bible-text/mat-22-32, bible-text/mat-22-33

Source

> 그날에 부활이 없다고 말하는 사두개 사람들이 예수께 와서 물었다. "선생님, 모세가 말하기를 '어떤 사람이 자식 없이 죽으면 그 동생이 형수에게 장가들어 형을 위하여 자손을 이어 주어야 한다'고 하였습니다. 그런데 우리 가운데 일곱 형제가 있었습니다. 맏이가 장가들었다가 죽었는데, 자식이 없어 그 아내를 동생에게 남겼습니다. 둘째도, 셋째도 그러하여 일곱째까지 모두 그러하였습니다. 그들 모두가 죽은 뒤에 마침내 그 여자도 죽었습니다. 그러면 부활 때에 그 여자는 일곱 사람 가운데 누구의 아내가 됩니까? 그들 모두가 그 여자를 아내로 삼았으니 말입니다." 그러나 예수께서 그들에게 대답하셨다. "너희가 성경도 하나님의 능력도 알지 못하므로 잘못 생각하는 것이다. 부활 때에는 시집도 장가도 가지 않고 하늘에 있는 하나님의 천사들과 같다. 죽은 사람의 부활에 관하여는, 하나님께서 너희에게 하신 말씀을 너희가 읽어 보지 못하였느냐? 하나님께서 말씀하시기를, '나는 아브라함의 하나님이요, 이삭의 하나님이요, 야곱의 하나님이다' 하셨다. 하나님은 죽은 사람의 하나님이 아니라 살아 있는 사람의 하나님이시다." 무리가 이 말씀을 듣고 그의 가르침에 놀랐다. (마 22:23-33)

여기서 우리는 그리스도와 사두개 사람들 사이의 부활에 관한 논쟁을 살펴본다. 바리새 사람들이 세금 문제로 그분을 공격한 것과 같은 날이었다. 진리는 항상 어느 한 방면에서든 반박을 받는다.

**첫째, 사두개 사람들이 종교의 큰 진리에 반대하는 것을 살펴본다.** 그들은 부활이 없다고 말한다. 이 이단들은 주전 약 이백팔십사 년 전에 사는 소코의 제자 사독의 이름을 따서 사두개인이라 불렸다. 그들은 자기 민족의 저술가들 사이에서 행실이 천박한 자들로 심한 비난을 받았으니, 자신들의 원칙이 그들을 그렇게 이끌었다. 그들은 부활을 부인하고 내세가 없다고 하였다. 이 세상 이후에는 몸이 죽으면 영혼도 소멸한다고 주장하였다. 보상과 형벌의 내세 상태가 없으며, 다가오는 심판도 없다고 하였다. 그들은 하나님 외에는 영이 없다고 주장하였다(행 23:8). 바리새 사람들과 사두개 사람들은 서로 적대하면서도 그리스도에게 대항하여 연합하였다. 그리스도의 복음은 한편으로는 미신적이고 형식적인 위선자들과 광신자들에게, 다른 편으로는 불경건한 이신론자들과 불신자들에게 항상 고통을 받아왔다.

**둘째, 그들이 이 진리에 반대하여 만든 반론을 살펴본다.** 이것은 일곱 남편을 차례로 가진 여자의 가상의 경우에서 가져온 것이다. 그들은 부활이 있다면, 우리가 지금 처한 상태와 같은 상태로 돌아가는 것이라고 전제하였다. (1) 그들은 이 문제에서 모세의 율법을 인용한다(마 22:24). 자식 없이 죽은 자의 아내는 다음 형제가 취해야 한다는 것이다(신 25:5). 이것은 가족과 유산의 구별을 보존하기 위한 유대 국가의 정치적 법이었다. (2) 그들은 이 규례에 따른 경우를 제시한다(마 22:25-27). 일곱 형제가 같은 여자와 차례로 결혼한 경우이다. 이 경우는 (1) 죽음이 가족에게 종종 가져오는 황폐함을 가정한다. 여럿이 성장하여 있던 가족이 아들도 조카도 남기지 못하게 되었다. "주님께서 집을 세우시지 않으면 세우는 자들이 헛되이 수고한다." 어느 누구도 죽음과 협약을 맺거나 무덤과 합의를 하지 않는 한 자기 이름과 가문의 번성과 영속을 확신할 수 없다. (2) 이 일곱 형제들이 거부하면 수치를 받는 처벌 아래에서도 율법에 복종하였다는 것을 가정한다(신 25:7). 주목하라. 낙담시키는 섭리가 있더라도 우리는 결과가 아니라 규칙에 따라 인도함을 받아야 하기 때문에 우리의 의무를 해야 한다. "마침내 그 여자도 죽었다." 주목하라. 살아남은 자도 겨우 유예를 받은 것뿐이다. 차례로 이웃과 동료들을 묻는 자들도 불멸을 얻지 못한다. 죽음의 쓴 잔은 돌고 돌며, 늦든 빠르든 우리 모두가 그것을 마셔야 한다(렘 25:26). (3) 그들은 이 경우에 대해 의문을 제기한다(마 22:28). "부활 때에 그 여자는 일곱 사람 가운데 누구의 아내가 됩니까? 말할 수 없다. 그러므로 부활이 없다는 결론을 내려야 한다."

**셋째, 이 반론에 대한 그리스도의 대답을 살펴본다.** 그분은 그들의 무지를 책망하시고 그 실수를 교정하심으로써 반론이 잘못된 것임을 보여 주신다. (1) 그들의 무지를 책망하신다(마 22:29). "너희가 잘못 생각하는 것이다." 주목하라. 부활과 내세를 부인하는 자들은 그리스도의 판단에 크게 잘못 생각하는 것이다. 주목하라. 무지가 오류의 원인이다. 어두운 곳에 있는 자들은 길을 잃는다. 오류의 옹호자들은 그러므로 빛을 거부하고 지식의 열쇠를 빼앗으려 한다. "너희가 이 문제에서 잘못 생각하니, 알지 못하기 때문이다." 주목하라. 부활과 내세에 관한 무지가 그것들을 부인하는 근거이다. 지금 특정한 경우에 그것이 어떤 것인지는 가장 지혜롭고 선한 자들도 알지 못한다. 그것은 아직 나타나지 않은 영광이다. 분리된 영혼의 상태, 몸의 부활, 영원한 행복과 형벌에 대해 말할 때 우리는 곧 막힌다. 그러나 이것은 우리가 어둠 속에 남겨진 것이 아니다. 그것이 감사하게도 그렇지 않으며, 그것을 부인하는 자들은 고의적이고 의도적인 무지를 범하는 것이다.

(1) 그들은 하나님의 능력을 알지 못한다. 이것은 부활과 내세가 있을 수 있다는 것을 추론하게 할 것이다. 주목하라. 하나님의 능력에 대한 무지나 불신앙 또는 약한 믿음이 부활을 부인하는 것의 바닥에 있다. 우리가 영혼이 몸에서 분리된 상태에서 존재하고 활동한다는 것을, 특히 오랫동안 무덤에 누워 공통의 구별되지 않는 먼지가 된 죽은 몸이 그것이 존재했던 동일한 몸으로 다시 일어나 살고 움직이고 행동할 것이라는 것을 들을 때, 우리는 어떻게 이런 일들이 될 수 있느냐고 묻기 쉽다. 하나님께 불가능한 것은 없다는 것을 굳게 믿는다면, 이 모든 어려움이 사라진다(행 26:8). (2) 그들은 성경을 알지 못한다. 성경은 부활과 내세가 있을 것이라고 단정적으로 확언한다. 욥은 그것을 알았고(욥 19:26), 에스겔이 예언하였고(겔 37장), 다니엘이 분명히 예언하였다(단 12:2). 그리스도는 성경에 따라 다시 살아나셨고(고전 15:3), 우리도 그러할 것이다.

(2) 그분이 그들의 실수를 교정하신다(마 22:30). 그 상태에 대해 주목하라. 그 상태는 우리가 지금 이 땅에서 처한 상태와 같지 않다. "부활 때에는 시집도 장가도 가지 않는다." 현재 상태에서는 결혼이 필요하다. 결혼은 무죄한 상태에서 제정되었다. 그 세계에서는 시집도 장가도 가지 않는다. 영화롭게 된 몸에 남녀 구별이 있을지에 대해 어떤 이들은 지나치게 궁금해하지만(옛 교부들이 이에 대한 의견이 갈렸다), 구별이 있든 없든, 연합은 없을 것임이 분명하다. 하나님께서 모든 것 안에서 모든 것이 되실 그곳에서는 다른 배필이 필요 없다. 몸이 영적으로 될 것이며, 그 안에 충족되어야 할 육적인 욕구가 없을 것이다. 신비적 몸이 완성될 때에는, 결혼의 한 목적이었던 경건한 자손을 추구하는 것(말 2:15)이 더 이상 필요하지 않을 것이다. 하늘에서는 개인의 쇠함이 없을 것이니 먹고 마심도 없고, 종의 쇠함도 없을 것이니 결혼도 없다. 또한 그 상태는 천사들과 같다. "그들은 하늘에 있는 하나님의 천사들과 같다." 순수하고 영적인 천사들과 같고, 천사들처럼 알고 사랑하며, 그 복된 스랍들처럼 하나님을 영원히 찬양한다. 성도들의 몸은 썩지 않고 영광스럽게 일어날 것이다(고전 15:42). 우리는 따라서 천사들이 하늘에서 행하는 것처럼 하나님의 뜻을 지금 행하기를 바라고 힘써야 한다. 우리가 곧 천사들과 같이 될 것을 소망하기 때문이다.

**넷째, 부활과 내세라는 이 위대한 진리를 확증하는 그리스도의 논증을 살펴본다.** 그분은 성경에서 논증을 이끌어 내셨다. "하나님께서 너희에게 하신 말씀을 너희가 읽어 보지 못하였느냐?" 주목하라. (1) 성경이 말하는 것은 하나님이 말씀하시는 것이다. (2) 모세에게 말씀하신 것은 우리에게도 말씀하신 것이다. 기록된 것은 우리의 배움을 위한 것이다. (3) 하나님께서 말씀하신 것을 읽고 듣는 것은 우리에게 관계된 일이다. 논증은 모세의 글에서 이끌어 낸 것인데, 이는 사두개 사람들이 모세의 글만을, 또는 주로 정경 성경으로 받아들였기 때문이다.

논증은 이것이다(마 22:32). "나는 아브라함의 하나님이요, 이삭의 하나님이요, 야곱의 하나님이다." 이것은 명시적 증명이 아니지만 실제로 결정적인 논증이다. (1) 어떤 이의 하나님이 된다는 것은 특별한 특권과 행복을 내포한다. 무한히, 처음부터 영원히 선하신 하나님은 첫 번째로 사랑받으셔야 하며, 그분 외에 아무것도 그분을 위한 것 외에는 사랑받지 않아야 한다. [1] 하나님은 그분을 하나님으로 삼은 자에게 충분한 은인이시다. [2] 이 선한 사람들이 이 세상에서 그처럼 위대한 말씀의 성취처럼 보이는 특별한 행복을 가지지 못하였음이 분명하다. 그들은 약속의 땅에서 나그네였고, 떠돌아다니며 흉년으로 쪼들렸다. 약속의 그늘 아래 있었던 자들에 비해 현재의 기쁨이 너무 부족하였다. 이 세상에서 이 위대하고 선한 사람들을 위해 그처럼 위대한 말씀에 걸맞은 행복이 예비되어 있지 않다면, 지혜와 선하심과 신실하심의 하나님을 야곱의 하나님이라 부르는 것은 영원한 치욕이 될 것이다. [3] 그러므로 의인들이 진정으로 그리고 지속적으로 행복한 미래 상태가 반드시 있어야 한다. 사도의 말(히 11:16)이 이 논증의 열쇠이다. "이러므로 하나님이 그들의 하나님이라 일컬음 받으심을 부끄러워하지 아니하시나니, 이는 그들을 위하여 한 성, 하늘에 있는 성을 예비하셨음이라." (2) 영혼이 불멸하며 몸이 다시 일어나 연합할 것이라는 것도 증명된다. 하나님이 이 말씀을 하신 시간을 생각할 때—이것은 아브라함과 이삭과 야곱이 죽어 장사된 지 오랜 후에 모세에게 하신 말씀이다—하나님은 "나는 …의 하나님이었다"가 아니라 "나는 …의 하나님이다"라고 말씀하신다. 이제 하나님은 죽은 사람의 하나님이 아니라 살아 있는 사람의 하나님이시다. 그분이 그들의 하나님이시라면, 아브라함은 그때도 살아 있어야 한다. 이것은 영혼의 불멸을 증명하고, 그에 따라 몸의 부활을 함축한다. 이 교리는 그리스도의 부활 이후 더 완전한 계시를 위해 예비되어 있었다.

마지막으로, 이 논쟁의 결과를 살펴본다. 사두개 사람들은 입을 다물었고(마 22:34), 그리하여 수치를 당하였다. 그들은 자신들이 그리스도를 수치스럽게 할 준비를 하면서 자신들이 수치를 당할 준비를 하고 있었다. 그러나 무리들은 이 가르침에 놀랐다(마 22:33). 주목하라. 많은 반대자들이 잠잠해지고 많은 청중들이 놀라게 되지만, 구원받는 회심은 없다. 성화되지 않은 영혼들이 침묵하고 놀라는 가운데서도 하나님은 그분의 율법을, 그분의 복음을 영예롭게 하신다.

---

원주석

34~40절 카드 ↗

The Substance of the Commandments. 34 But when the Pharisees had heard that he had put the Sadducees to silence, they were gathered together. 35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, 36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? 37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. Here is a discourse which Christ had with a Pharisee-lawyer, about the great commandment of the law. Observe, I. The combination of the Pharisees against Christ, Matthew 22:34 ; Matthew 22:34 . They heard that he had put the Sadducees to silence, had stopped their mouths, though their understandings were not opened; and they were gathered together, not to return him the thanks of their party, as they ought to have done, for his effectually asserting and confirming of the truth against the Sadducees, the common enemies of their religion, but to tempt him, in hopes to get the reputation of puzzling him who had puzzled the Sadducees. They were more vexed that Christ was honoured, than pleased that the Sadducees were silenced; being more concerned for their own tyranny and traditions, which Christ opposed, than for the doctrine of the resurrection and a future state, which the Sadducees opposed. Note, It is an instance of Pharisaical envy and malice, to be displeased at the maintaining of a confessed truth, when it is done by those we do not like; to sacrifice a public good to private piques and prejudices. Blessed Paul was otherwise minded, Philippians 1:18 . II. The lawyer's question, which he put to Christ. The lawyers were students in, and teachers of, the law of Moses, as the scribes were; but some think that in this they differed, that they dealt more in practical questions than the scribes; they studied and professed casuistical divinity. This lawyer asked him a question, tempting him; not with any design to ensnare him, as appears by St. Mark's relation of the story, where we find that this was he to whom Christ said, Thou are not far from the kingdom of God, Mark 12:34 , but only to see what he would say, and to draw on discourse with him, to satisfy his own and his friends' curiosity. 1. The question was, Master, which is the greatest commandment of the law? A needless question, when all the things of God's law are great things ( Hosea 8:12 ), and the wisdom from above is without partiality, partiality in the law ( Malachi 2:9 ), and hath respect to them all. Yet it is true, there are some commands that are the principles of the oracles of God, more extensive and inclusive than others. Our Saviour speaks of the weightier matters of the law, Matthew 23:23 ; Matthew 23:23 . 2. The design was to try him, or tempt him; to try, not so much his knowledge as his judgment. It was a question disputed among the critics in the law. Some would have the law of circumcision to be the great commandment, others the law of the sabbath, others the law of sacrifices, according as they severally stood affected, and spent their zeal; now they would try what Christ said to this question, hoping to incense the people against him, if he should not answer according to the vulgar opinion; and if he should magnify one commandment, they would reflect on him as vilifying the rest. The question was harmless enough; and it appears by comparing Luke 10:27 ; Luke 10:28 , that it was an adjudged point among the lawyers, that the love of God and our neighbour is the great commandment, and the sum of all the rest, and Christ had there approved it; so the putting of it to him here seems rather a scornful design to catechise him as a child, than spiteful design to dispute with him as an adversary. III. Christ's answer to this question; it is well for us that such a question was asked him, that we might have his answer. It is no disparagement to great men to answer plain questions. Now Christ recommends to us those as the great commandments, not which are so exclusive of others, but which are therefore great because inclusive of others. Observe, 1. Which these great commandments are ( Matthew 22:37-39 ; Matthew 22:37-39 ); not the judicial laws, those could not be the greatest now that the people of the Jews, to whom they pertained, were so little; not the ceremonial laws, those could not be the greatest, now that they were waxen old, and were ready to vanish away; nor any particular moral precept; but the love of God and our neighbour, which are the spring and foundation of all the rest, which (these being supposed) will follow of course. (1.) All the law is fulfilled in one word, and that is, love. See Romans 13:10 . All obedience begins in the affections, and nothing in religion is done right, that is not done there first. Love is the leading affection, which gives law, and gives ground, to the rest; and therefore that, as the main fort, is to be first secured and garrisoned for God. Man is a creature cut out for love; thus therefore is the law written in the heart, that it is a law of love. Love is a short and sweet word; and, if that be the fulfilling of the law, surely the yoke of the command is very easy. Love is the rest and satisfaction of the soul; if we walk in this good old way, we shall find rest. (2.) The love of God is the first and great commandment of all, and the summary of all the commands of the first table. The proper act of love being complacency, good is the proper object of it. Now God, being good infinitely, originally, and eternally, is to be loved in the first place, and nothing loved beside him, but what is loved for him. Love is the first and great thing that God demands from us, and therefore the first and great thing that we should devote to him. Now here we are directed, [1.] To love God as ours; Thou shalt love the Lord they God as thine. The first commandment is, Thou shalt have no other God; which implies that we must have him for our God, and that will engage our love to him. Those that made the sun and moon their gods, loved them, Jeremiah 8:2 ; Judges 18:24 . To love God as ours is to love him because he is ours, our Creator, Owner, and Ruler, and to conduct ourselves to him as ours, with obedience to him, and dependence on him. We must love God as reconciled to us, and made ours by covenant; that is the foundation of this, Thy God. [2.] To love him with all our heart, and soul, and mind. Some make these to signify one and the same thing, to love him with all our powers; others distinguish them; the heart, soul, and mind, are the will, affections, and understanding; or the vital, sensitive, and intellectual faculties. Our love of God must be a sincere love, and not in word and tongue only, as theirs is who say they love him, but their hearts are not with him. It must be a strong love, we must love him in the most intense degree; as we must praise him, so we must love him, with all that is within us, Psalms 103:1 . It must be a singular and superlative love, we must love him more than any thing else; this way the stream of our affections must entirely run. The heart must be united to love God, in opposition to a divided heart. All our love is too little to bestow upon him, and therefore all the powers of the soul must be engaged for him, and carried out toward him. This is the first and great commandment; for obedience to this is the spring of obedience to all the rest; which is then only acceptable, when it flows from love. (3.) To love our neighbour as ourselves is the second great commandment ( Matthew 22:39 ; Matthew 22:39 ); It is like unto that first; it is inclusive of all the precepts of the second table, as that is of the first. It is like it, for it is founded upon it, and flows from it; and a right love to our brother, whom we have seen, is both an instance and an evidence of our love to God, whom we have not seen, 1 John 4:20 . [1.] It is implied, that we do, and should, love ourselves. There is a self-love which is corrupt, and the root of the greatest sins, and it must be put off and mortified: but there is a self-love which is natural, and the rule of the greatest duty, and it must be preserved and sanctified. We must love ourselves, that is, we must have a due regard to the dignity of our own natures, and a due concern for the welfare of our own souls and bodies. [2.] It is prescribed, that we love our neighbour as ourselves. We must honour and esteem all men, and must wrong and injure none; must have a good will to all, and good wishes for all, and, as we have opportunity, must do good to all. We must love our neighbour as ourselves, as truly and sincerely as we love ourselves, and in the same instances; nay, in many cases we must deny ourselves for the good of our neighbour, and must make ourselves servants to the true welfare of others, and be willing to spend and be spent for them, to lay down our lives for the brethren. 2. Observe what the weight and greatness of these commandments is ( Matthew 22:40 ; Matthew 22:40 ); On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets; that is, This is the sum and substance of all those precepts relating to practical religion which were written in men's hearts by nature, revived by Moses, and backed and enforced by the preaching and writing of the prophets. All hang upon the law of love; take away this, and all falls to the ground, and comes to nothing. Rituals and ceremonials must give way to these, as must all spiritual gifts, for love is the more excellent way. This is the spirit of the law, which animates it, the cement of the law, which joins it; it is the root and spring of all other duties, the compendium of the whole Bible, not only of the law and the prophets, but of the gospel too, only supposing this love to be the fruit of faith, and that we love God in Christ, and our neighbour for his sake. All hangs on these two commandments, as the effect doth both on its efficient and on its final cause; for the fulfilling of the law is love ( Romans 13:10 ) and the end of the law is love, 1 Timothy 1:5 . The law of love is the nail, is the nail in the sure place, fastened by the masters of assemblies ( Ecclesiastes 12:11 ), on which is hung all the glory of the law and the prophets ( Isaiah 22:24 ), a nail that shall never be drawn; for on this nail all the glory of the new Jerusalem shall eternally hang. Love never faileth. Into these two great commandments therefore let our hearts be delivered as into a mould; in the defence and evidence of these let us spend our zeal, and not in notions, names, and strifes of words, as if those were the mighty things on which the law and the prophets hung, and to them the love of God and our neighbour must be sacrificed; but to the commanding power of these let every thing else be made to bow. return to ' Top of Page ' <a name="verses-41-46" class="com-number"

Pericope (part_of)

절 (explains)

bible-text/mat-22-34, bible-text/mat-22-35, bible-text/mat-22-36, bible-text/mat-22-37, bible-text/mat-22-38, bible-text/mat-22-39, bible-text/mat-22-40

Source

> 한편 바리새 사람들은 예수께서 사두개 사람들의 입을 막으셨다는 말을 듣고 함께 모였다. 그 가운데 한 율법사가 예수를 시험하여 물었다. "선생님, 율법 가운데 어느 계명이 가장 큽니까?" 예수께서 그에게 말씀하셨다. "'네 마음을 다하고 네 목숨을 다하고 네 뜻을 다하여 주 너의 하나님을 사랑하여라.' 이것이 첫째가는 큰 계명이다. 둘째도 이와 같으니 '네 이웃을 네 몸과 같이 사랑하여라' 하는 것이다. 온 율법과 선지자의 말씀이 이 두 계명에 달려 있다." (마 22:34-40)

여기서 우리는 그리스도와 어떤 바리새 사람 율법사 사이의 율법의 가장 큰 계명에 관한 담화를 살펴본다.

**첫째, 그리스도에 대항한 바리새 사람들의 연합을 살펴본다(마 22:34).** 그들은 예수께서 사두개 사람들의 입을 막으셨다는 소식을 들었다. 그들의 입을 막았지만 그들의 이해를 열지는 못하였다. 그들은 함께 모였다. 그러나 그것은 그리스도의 원수들의 공동 원수인 사두개 사람들을 그분이 효과적으로 주장하고 확증하신 것에 감사하기 위한 것이 아니라—그래야 마땅했겠지만—그를 시험하기 위한 것이었다. 사두개 사람들을 당혹스럽게 한 그분을 당혹스럽게 할 공명을 얻기를 바라면서. 그들은 그리스도가 존경받는 것에 사두개 사람들이 잠잠해진 것보다 더 괴로워하였다. 주목하라. 공인된 진리를 지지하는 일에 불쾌함을 느끼는 것은 바리새적 시기와 악의의 표시이다.

**둘째, 율법사의 질문을 살펴본다.** 그는 그분을 시험하며 물었다. 마가복음의 기사를 보면(막 12:34), 이것은 그를 적대자가 아니라 어느 정도 호의적으로 다룬 자였으며, 그리스도께서 그에게 "너는 하나님 나라에서 멀지 않다"고 하신 자임을 알 수 있다. 그러므로 이것은 그를 함정에 빠뜨리려는 것이 아니라 자신과 친구들의 호기심을 채우기 위해 담화를 이끌어 내려는 것이었다. 질문은 "율법 가운데 어느 계명이 가장 큽니까?"였다. 하나님의 율법의 모든 것이 중요한 것인데도(호 8:12) 이 질문은 불필요한 것이다. 그러나 어떤 계명들은 다른 것들보다 더 광범위하고 포괄적인 것이 사실이다. 우리 주님은 율법의 더 중요한 것들에 대해 말씀하신다(마 23:23). 그들은 그것을 시험해 보고 싶었다. 각자의 관심과 열심에 따라 어떤 이는 할례법이, 어떤 이는 안식일법이, 어떤 이는 희생 규례가 가장 큰 계명이라고 주장하였다.

**셋째, 이 질문에 대한 그리스도의 대답을 살펴본다.** 이런 질문이 제기되어 그분의 대답을 들을 수 있어서 우리에게 복이다. 위대한 분들에게 단순한 질문에 대답하는 것은 격을 낮추는 일이 아니다. 이제 그리스도는 다른 것들을 배제하는 의미에서가 아니라 다른 것들을 포함하기 때문에 위대한 계명들을 권하신다.

(1) 이 위대한 계명들이 무엇인지를 살펴본다(마 22:37-39). 사법 율법도 아니고—이제 유대 백성이 너무 작아진 마당에 그것이 가장 클 수 없으니—예식 율법도 아니다. 그것들은 낡아지며 사라져 가고 있으니. 어떤 특별한 도덕 규범도 아니다. 이 두 가지—사랑의 법—는 모든 율법의 뿌리이자 근원이다. [1] 율법의 모든 것은 한 단어 안에 성취되며, 그것은 사랑이다(롬 13:10을 보라). 모든 순종은 감정에서 시작되며, 종교 안의 어떤 것도 거기서 먼저 행해지지 않으면 올바르게 행해지지 않는다. 사랑은 인도하는 감정이다. 사람은 사랑을 위해 만들어진 존재이다. 그러므로 율법이 마음에 기록된 것은 그것이 사랑의 법이라는 것이다. 사랑은 짧고 달콤한 단어이며, 율법의 성취가 그것이라면 계명의 멍에는 참으로 가볍다. 사랑은 영혼의 안식과 만족이다. 이 좋은 옛길로 걸으면 쉼을 찾을 것이다. [2] 하나님을 사랑하는 것이 첫째가는 큰 계명이며, 첫 번째 돌판의 모든 계명의 요약이다. 하나님은 무한히, 처음부터, 영원히 선하신 분이시므로, 가장 먼저 사랑받으셔야 하며, 그분 외에는 아무것도 그분을 위한 것 외에는 사랑받지 않아야 한다. 사랑은 하나님이 우리에게서 요구하시는 첫째가는 위대한 것이므로, 우리가 그분께 드려야 할 첫째가는 위대한 것이다. 우리는 이렇게 지시받는다. [a] 하나님을 우리의 하나님으로 사랑하는 것이다. "주 너의 하나님을 사랑하여라." 첫 계명은 "다른 신들을 네게 두지 말라"인데, 이는 우리가 그분을 우리의 하나님으로 삼아야 한다는 것을 함축한다. [b] 마음을 다하고 목숨을 다하고 뜻을 다하여 그분을 사랑하는 것이다. 어떤 이들은 이것이 모두 같은 것, 즉 모든 능력을 다하여 그분을 사랑하는 것을 의미한다고 한다. 우리의 하나님 사랑은 진실해야 한다. 강해야 한다. 다른 것보다 우위에 있어야 한다. 마음이 하나가 되어 하나님을 사랑해야 한다. 그분께 주기에 너무 많은 사랑은 없으므로 영혼의 모든 능력이 그분을 위해 동원되고 그분을 향해 나아가야 한다. 이것이 첫째가는 큰 계명이다. 이것에 대한 순종이 모든 다른 것에 대한 순종의 원동력이기 때문이다.

(2) 이웃을 자신과 같이 사랑하는 것이 둘째 큰 계명이다(마 22:39). "이것은 첫째 것과 같다." 그것은 두 번째 돌판의 모든 규범을 포함하는 것이다. 그것이 첫째 것과 같은 것은, 그것이 첫째 것 위에 기초를 두고 그것에서 흘러 나오기 때문이다. [1] 우리가 자신을 사랑하는 것이 당연함을 전제한다. 부패한 자기 사랑이 있는데, 이것은 가장 큰 죄들의 뿌리이며, 죽어 없어져야 한다. 그러나 자연스러운 자기 사랑이 있는데, 이것은 가장 큰 의무들의 규칙이며, 보존되고 거룩하게 되어야 한다. [2] 이웃을 자신과 같이 사랑하라고 규정한다. 우리는 모든 사람을 존중하고 존경해야 하며, 아무에게도 잘못과 해를 끼쳐서는 안 된다. 모든 이에게 선의와 선한 소원을 가져야 하며, 기회가 되는 대로 모든 이에게 선을 행해야 한다. 이웃의 참된 복지를 위해 자신을 부인하고 봉사자가 되어야 하며, 형제들을 위하여 기꺼이 생명을 버려야 한다.

(2) 이 계명들의 무게와 위대함이 무엇인지를 살펴본다(마 22:40). "온 율법과 선지자의 말씀이 이 두 계명에 달려 있다." 이것은 실천적 종교와 관련하여 사람들의 마음에 본성으로 기록되고 모세에 의해 새롭게 되고 선지자들의 가르침과 글로 뒷받침된 모든 규범의 요약이자 본질이다. 모든 것이 사랑의 법에 달려 있다. 이것을 빼면 모든 것이 무너지고 아무것도 남지 않는다. 예식과 의식법은 이것에 양보해야 하며, 영적 은사들도 그러해야 한다. 사랑이 더 탁월한 길이기 때문이다. 이것이 율법의 영으로, 율법에 생명을 불어넣는 것이다. 이것은 율법의 시멘트로, 율법을 연결한다. 그것은 모든 다른 의무들의 뿌리이자 샘이요, 성경 전체의 요약이다. 율법과 선지자만이 아니라 복음도, 그것이 이 사랑을 믿음의 열매이고 우리가 그리스도 안에서 하나님을 사랑하고 그분을 위해 이웃을 사랑하는 것임을 전제한다면. 모든 것이 이 두 계명에 달려 있다. 효력과 목적 원인 모두로 말이다. 율법의 성취는 사랑이고(롬 13:10), 율법의 끝도 사랑이다(딤전 1:5). 사랑의 법은 못이다—못 안에 있는 확실한 곳의 못, 총회의 선생들이 고정한 못이다(전 12:11). 그 못에 율법과 선지자의 모든 영광이 걸려 있다(사 22:24). 뽑히지 않을 못. 새 예루살렘의 모든 영광이 영원히 그 못에 걸려 있을 것이다. 사랑은 결코 끝나지 않는다. 그러므로 우리의 마음이 이 두 가지 큰 계명들에 틀처럼 드려지게 하라. 이것들의 변호와 증거에 우리의 열심을 쏟자. 사랑이 달려 있게 한 것들, 즉 율법과 선지자와 복음이 모두 이 사랑에 굴복하게 하자.

---

원주석

41~46절 카드 ↗

The Pharisees Silenced. 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? 46 And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions. Many questions the Pharisees had asked Christ, by which, though they thought to pose him, they did but ex pose themselves; but now let him ask them a question; and he will do it when they are gathered together, Matthew 22:41 ; Matthew 22:41 . He did not take some one of them apart from the rest ( ne Hercules contra duos--Hercules himself may be overmatched ), but, to shame them the more, he took them all together, when they were in confederacy and consulting against him, and yet puzzled them. Note, God delights to baffle his enemies when they most strengthen themselves; he gives them all the advantages they can wish for, and yet conquers them. Associate yourselves, and you shall be broken in pieces, Isaiah 3:9 ; Isaiah 3:10 . Now here, I. Christ proposes a question to them, which they could easily answer; it was a question in their own catechism; " What think ye of Christ? Whose Son is He? Whose Son do you expect the Messiah to be, who was promised to the fathers?" This they could easily answer, The Son of David. It was the common periphrasis of the Messiah; they called him the Son of David. So the scribes, who expounded the scripture, had taught them, from Psalms 89:35 ; Psalms 89:36 , I will not lie unto David; his seed shall endure for ever ( Isaiah 9:7 ), upon the throne of David. And Isaiah 11:1 , A rod out of the stem of Jesse. The covenant of royalty made with David was a figure of the covenant of redemption made with Christ, who as David, was made King with an oath, and was first humbled and then advanced. If Christ was the Son of David, he was really and truly Man. Israel said, We have ten parts in David; and Judah said, He is our bone and our flesh; what part have we then in the Son of David, who took our nature upon him? What think ye of Christ? They had put questions to him, one after another, out of the law; but he comes and puts a question to them upon the promise. Many are so full of the law, that they forget Christ, as if their duties would save them without his merit and grace. It concerns each of us seriously to ask ourselves, What think we of Christ? Some think not of him at all, he is not in all, not in any, of their thoughts; some think meanly, and some think hardly, of him; but to them that believe he is precious; and how precious then are the thoughts of him! While the daughters of Jerusalem think no more of Christ than of another beloved; the spouse thinks of him as the Chief of ten thousands. II. He starts a difficulty upon their answer, which they could not easily solve, Matthew 22:43-45 ; Matthew 22:43-45 . Many can so readily affirm the truth, that they think they have knowledge enough to be proud of, who, when they are called to confirm the truth, and to vindicate and defend it, show they have ignorance enough to be ashamed of. The objection Christ raised was, If Christ be David's son, how then doth David, in spirit, call him Lord? He did not hereby design to ensnare them, as they did him, but to instruct them in a truth they were loth to believe--that the expected Messiah is God. 1. It is easy to see that David calls Christ Lord, and this in spirit being divinely inspired, and actuated therein by a spirit of prophecy; for it was the Spirit of the Lord that spoke by him, 2 Samuel 23:1 ; 2 Samuel 23:2 . David was one of those holy men that spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost, especially in calling Christ Lord; for it was then, as it is still ( 1 Corinthians 12:3 ) that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost. Now, to prove that David, in spirit, called Christ Lord, he quotes Psalms 110:1 , which psalm the scribes themselves understood of Christ; of him, it is certain, the prophet there speaks, of him and of no other man; and it is a prophetical summary of the doctrine of Christ, it describes him executing the offices of a Prophet, Priest, and King, both in his humiliation and also in his exaltation. Christ quotes the whole verse, which shows the Redeemer in his exaltation; (1.) Sitting at the right hand of God. His sitting denotes both rest and rule; his sitting at God's right hand denotes superlative honour and sovereign power. See in what great words this is expressed ( Hebrews 8:1 ); He is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty. See Philippians 2:9 ; Ephesians 1:20 . He did not take this honour to himself, but was entitled to it by covenant with his Father, and invested in it by commission from him, and here is that commission. (2.) Subduing his enemies. There he shall sit, till they be all made either his friends or his footstool. The carnal mind, wherever it is, is enmity to Christ; and that is subdued in the conversion of the willing people that are called to his foot (as the expression is, Isaiah 41:2 ), and in the confusion of his impenitent adversaries, who shall be brought under his foot, as the kings of Canaan were under the feet of Joshua. But that which this verse is quoted for is, that David calls the Messiah his Lord; the Lord, Jehovah, said unto my Lord. This intimates to us, that in expounding scripture we must take notice of, and improve, not only that which is the main scope and sense of a verse, but of the words and phrases, by which they Spirit chooses to express that sense, which have often a very useful and instructive significance. Here is a good note from that word, My Lord. 2. It is not so easy for those who believe not the Godhead of the Messiah, to clear this from an absurdity, if Christ b David's son. It is incongruous for the father to speak of his son, the predecessor of his successor, as his Lord. If David call him Lord, that is laid down ( Matthew 22:45 ; Matthew 22:45 ) as the magis notum--the more evident truth; for whatever is said of Christ's humanity and humiliation must be construed and understood in consistency with the truth of his divine nature and dominion. We must hold this fast, that he is David's Lord, and by that explain his being David's son. The seeming differences of scripture, as here, may not only be accommodated, but contribute to the beauty and harmony of the whole. Amicæ scripturarum lites, utinam et nostræ--The differences observable in the scriptures are of a friendly kind; would to God that our differences were of the same kind! III. We have here the success of this gentle trial which Christ made of the Pharisees' knowledge, in two things. 1. It puzzled them ( Matthew 22:46 ; Matthew 22:46 ); No man was able to answer him a word. Either it was their ignorance that they did not know, or their impiety that they would not own, the Messiah to be God; which truth was the only key to unlock this difficulty. What those Rabbies could not then answer, blessed be God, the plainest Christian that is led into the understanding of the gospel of Christ, can now account for; that Christ, as God, was David's Lord; and Christ, as Man, was David's son. This he did not now himself explain, but reserved it till the proof of it was completed by his resurrection; but we have it fully explained by him in his glory ( Revelation 22:16 ); I am the root and the offspring of David. Christ, as God, was David's Root; Christ, as Man, was David's Offspring. If we hold not fast this truth, that Jesus Christ is over all God blessed for ever, we run ourselves into inextricable difficulties. And well might David, his remote ancestor, call him Lord, when Mary, his immediate mother, after she had conceived him, called him, Lord and God, her Saviour, Luke 1:46 ; Luke 1:47 . 2. It silenced them, and all others that sought occasion against him; Neither durst any man, from that day forth, ask him any more such captious, tempting, ensnaring questions. Note, God will glorify himself in the silencing of many whom he will not glorify himself in the salvation of. Many are convinced, that are not converted, by the word. Had these been converted, they would have asked him more questions, especially that great question, What must we do to be saved? But since they could not gain their point, they would have no more to do with him. But, thus all that strive with their Master shall be convinced, as these Pharisees and lawyers here were, of the inequality of the match. return to ' Top of Page ' Matthew Mat 21 Matthew Mat Matthew Mat 23 Footnotes: Copyright Statement These files are public domain and are a derivative of an electronic edition that is available on the Christian Classics Ethereal Library Website. Bibliographical Information Henry, Matthew. "Complete Commentary on Matthew 22". "Henry's Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible". https://www.studylight.org/ commentaries/ eng/ mhm/ matthew-22.html. 1706. terms of use • privacy policy • • rights and permissions • contact sl • about sl • link to sl To report dead links, typos, or html errors or suggestions about making these resources more useful use the convenient contact form StudyLight.org © 2001-2026 Powered by Light speed Technology Ads Free Profile .sub-menu{font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;max-width:1260px;width:100%;background-color:#f7f7f7;color:#6b6b6b;border-bottom:5px solid #6b6b6b;display:flex;flex-direction:column;flex-wrap:nowrap;position:absolute;z-index:9998} .sub-menu .menu-group{width:100%;margin:0 5px 0;padding:0 5px 0;border-right:1px solid #6b6b6b} .sub-menu .menu-group-spacer{display:none} .sub-menu .menu-name{font-size:15px;font-weight:bold;color:#deac27} .sub-menu .menu-name a{color:#deac27} .sub-menu .menu-ul li a{color:#6b6b6b;} .sub-menu .menu-ul li:hover{color:#DD8000} .search-button{background-color:#6b6b6b;color:#fff;border:1px solid #6b6b6b;-webkit-appearance:square-button;padding:0 5px;font-size:13px} .int-search-div{display:flex;flex-direction:row;margin-top:10px;flex-wrap:nowrap;width:100%} .int-search-div .int-s-query{border:1px solid #dadada;font-size:13px;padding:0 5px 0;margin-right:5px;width:30%;height:30px;flex:1 1 100%} .int-search-div .int-s-button{width:50px;margin-right:10px;height:30px;flex:0 0 50px} .int-selections-div{display:flex;flex-direction:row;flex-wrap:nowrap;width:100%;margin-bottom:20px} .int-selections-div .int-s-section{border:1px solid #dadada;color:#6b6b6b;font-size:13px;margin:5px 5px 0 0;width:70px;height:30px;flex:1 1 50%} .int-selections-div .int-s-translation{border:1px solid #dadada;color:#6b6b6b;font-size:13px;margin-top:5px;padding:2px;width:40%;height:30px;flex:1 1 40%} .lex-search-div{display:flex;flex-direction:row;flex-wrap:nowrap;width:100%} .lex-search-div .lex-s-query{border:1px solid #dadada;width:95%;height:30px;font-size:13px;padding:5px;margin-right:5px} .lex-search-div .lex-s-range{border:1px solid #dadada;color:#6b6b6b;height:30px;font-size:13px;margin-right:5px;width:100px} .lex-search-languages{width:95%;font-size:11px;display:flex;flex-direction:row;flex-wrap:nowrap;justify-content:flex-start;margin-top:5px} .ill-quo-div{display:flex;flex-direction:row;flex-wrap:wrap;width:100%;margin-top:10px} .ill-quo-s-query{font-size:15px;color:#6b6b6b;padding:0 10px 0;border:1px solid #dadada;height:30px;width:100px;margin-right:5px;flex:1 1 auto} .ill-quo-s-select{border:1px solid #dadada;color:#6b6b6b;padding:5px;height:30px;margin-right:5px} .clickable{cursor:pointer} ia, qa{cursor:pointer;margin:0 4px; line-height:25px} @media only screen and (max-width: 899px) { .sub-menu{height:65%;overflow:scroll} .sub-menu .menu-group, .sub-menu .menu-group:first-child{border-right:0} .sub-menu .part2{margin-top:-24px} .sub-menu .menu-group .menu-ul{width:100%;display:flex;flex-direction:row;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:flex-start} .sub-menu .menu-group .menu-ul li{list-style:disc;list-style-position:outside;padding:0 15px 5px 0;flex-grow:0;flex-basis:50%} } @media only screen and (min-width: 900px) { .sub-menu{flex-direction:row;flex-wrap:nowrap;justify-content:space-between} .sub-menu .part2{padding-top:18px;margin-top:0} .sub-menu .menu-group:last-child{border-right:0} .sub-menu .menu-group-spacer {border-right:1px solid #6b6b6b;padding:5px 0} .sub-menu .menu-ul{width:100%} .sub-menu .menu-ul li{list-style:disc;list-style-position:outside;padding:0 15px 5px 0} .lex-search-div{width:95%} .lex-search-div .lex-s-range{width:70px} } Bible Commentaries (144) Verse‑by‑Verse Commentary Burton Coffman Commentaries Adam Clarke Commentary Albert Barnes' Notes John Gill's Exposition Complete List of 144 Bible Concordances (6) Thompson Chain Reference Nave's Topical Bible The Topical Concordances Torrey's Topical Textbook Scofield Reference Index Treasury of Scripture Knowledge Bible Dictionaries (26) Vine's Expository Dictionary Holman Bible Dictionary Baker's Evangelical Dictionary King James Dictionary Smith's Bible Dictionary Complete List of 26 Bible Encyclopedias (7) Int Standard Bible Encyclopedia The Nuttall Encyclopedia The 1901 Jewish Encylopedia The Catholic Encyclopedia Kitto's Bible Cyclopedia Complete List of 7 Interlinear Study Bible Hebrew Old Testament Greek Old and New Testament Strong's Interlinear Search Whole Bible ---------------- Old Testament New Testament ---------------- Books of Law Books of History Books of Wisdom Major Prophets Minor Prophets The Gospels Pauline Epistles General Epistles Apocalyptic Books NASB KJV HCS ESV BSB WEB Bible Lexicons (3) Old Testament/ New Testament Greek Old Testament Hebrew New Testament Aramaic Translated As Begins With Containing Ends With Exact matching Greek Hebrew Aramaic Original Language Studies (4) Bill Klein's "Greek Thoughts" Charles Loder's "Hebrew Thoughts" Benjamin Shaw's "Aramaic Thoughts" KJ Went's "Difficult Sayings" Additional Lexical Resources Berry's NT Synonyms Girdlestone's OT Synonyms Trench's NT Synonyms Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar Bullinger's Figures of Speech B.C. (Before Christ) Bible History, Old Testament Sketches of Jewish Social Life The Temple - Its Ministry and Service The Works of Flavius Josephus A.D. (Anno Domini) The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah John Foxe's "Book of Martyrs" History By Category Ussher's "The Annals of the World" Creeds and Statements Confession Catechisms Today in Christian History Church and Denominational History History of the Moravian Church History of the Catholic Church Sketches of Church History The History of Protestism Sermon Illustrations Archive Illustration Title or browse by: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Sermon Quotations Archive Quote Author or browse by: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Additional Resources Sunday Bulletin Inserts Gustave Doré's Illustrations Bible Maps Archive PowerPoint Bible Maps The Bible in Pictures Personalized Reading Plan Create a personalized plan Daily Reading Plans (7) Bible-in-a-Year Straight Thru the Bible Different Topics Chronological Order Historical Order NT, Psalms & Proverbs Old & New Testament Daily Devotionals Chip Shots from the Ruff of Life Morning and Evening with Tozer Voice of the Lord 'Every Day Light' Music For the Soul The Believer's Daily Remembrancer Daily Light on the Daily Path Spurgeon's "Faith's Checkbook" Spurgeon's "Morning & Evening" Truths to Live By - One Day at a Time Bowen's Daily Meditations Devotional Hours Within the Bible The Believer's Daily Remembrancer Daily Light on the Daily Path Spurgeon's "Faith's Checkbook" Spurgeon's "Morning & Evening" Truths to Live By - One Day at a Time Bowen's Daily Meditations Devotional Hours Within the Bible Site Tools Manage My Preferences Reset My Password Update My Email Address Manage My Subscriptions Site Info About SL Contact SL Copyright Statements Statement of Faith Rights and Permissions Privacy Policy Terms of Use Additional Features Bulletin Insert Font Resources Custom Search Plugins Multi-Media Center Audio Bibles ESV • KJV • NAS • NIV • NLT • NRS • WEB Video Bibles ASL Audio Commentaries TTB --> document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){document.querySelectorAll("qa").forEach(function(e){e.addEventListener("click",function(){document.location.href="/pastoral-resources/sermon-quotations-archive/"+this.textContent.toLowerCase()+".html"})}),document.querySelectorAll("ia").forEach(function(e){e.addEventListener("click",function(){document.location.href="/pastoral-resources/sermon-illustrations-archive/"+this.textContent.toLowerCase()+".html"})}),document.querySelector(".lex-s-button").addEventListener("click",function(){var e=document.querySelector("input[name=res]:checked"),t=e?e.value:"",n=document.querySelector(".lex-s-query").value,e=document.querySelector(".lex-s-range option:checked").value;window.location.href="/lexicons/eng/"+t+".html?action=search&ol="+t.substring(0,3)+"&w="+encodeURIComponent(n)+"&range="+encodeURIComponent(e)}),document.querySelector(".int-s-button").addEventListener("click",function(){var e=document.querySelector(".int-s-url").getAttribute("href")+"?q1="+encodeURIComponent(document.querySelector(".int-s-query").value)+"&tr3="+encodeURIComponent(document.querySelector(".int-s-translation").value)+"&ss="+encodeURIComponent(document.querySelector(".int-s-section").value);window.location.href=e}),document.querySelectorAll(".sub-menu input,.sub-menu select,.sub-menu textarea,.sub-menu label").forEach(function(el){el.addEventListener("click",function(e){e.stopPropagation()})})}); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a04e92ac18710d0e',t:'MTc4MDMyMDYyNg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})(); var value=localStorage.getItem("adsfree-subscriber");const stripe_status="live",stripe_public_key = "pk_live_51NefoTCuo3I044tv6ufC94ztfox67iUoMX4Et6azdLHDfZ2iSRli3v3knfjKFmxebnCamK3ul7W1u51PEvVU5PcV00nSe9hZ5P";var isEqualToOne="1"===value;window.onload = function() {af_script=document.createElement("script"),af_script.src=isEqualToOne?"https://www.studylight.info/jscripts/min/adsfree-profile.min.js?v=1.5.0":"https://www.studylight.info/jscripts/min/adsfree-login.min.js?v=1.5.0",document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(af_script)} var default_commentaryReferenceAction = "b"; var default_langtrans = "eng_nas"; var book_list_type = "3"; var com_lang = "eng"; var com_abbr = "mhm"; var com_type = "ch"; var cur_com_bn = "39"; var cur_com_cn = "22"; var cur_com_vs = ""; var com_abb = "commentaries_eng_mhm"; var book_data = [{num:0,name:"Genesis",url:"genesis",abbr:"Gen",sl:"ge",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]},{num:1,name:"Exodus",url:"exodus",abbr:"Exo",sl:"ex",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]},{num:2,name:"Leviticus",url:"leviticus",abbr:"Lev",sl:"le",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]},{num:3,name:"Numbers",url:"numbers",abbr:"Num",sl:"nu",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]},{num:4,name:"Deuteronomy",url:"deuteronomy",abbr:"Deu",sl:"de",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]},{num:5,name:"Joshua",url:"joshua",abbr:"Jos",sl:"jos",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]},{num:6,name:"Judges",url:"judges",abbr:"Jdg",sl:"jdg",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]},{num:7,name:"Ruth",url:"ruth",abbr:"Rut",sl:"ru",ch:[1,2,3,4]},{num:8,name:"1 Samuel",url:"1-samuel",abbr:"1Sa",sl:"1sa",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]},{num:9,name:"2 Samuel",url:"2-samuel",abbr:"2Sa",sl:"2sa",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]},{num:10,name:"1 Kings",url:"1-kings",abbr:"1Ki",sl:"1ki",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]},{num:11,name:"2 Kings",url:"2-kings",abbr:"2Ki",sl:"2ki",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]},{num:12,name:"1 Chronicles",url:"1-chronicles",abbr:"1Ch",sl:"1ch",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]},{num:13,name:"2 Chronicles",url:"2-chronicles",abbr:"2Ch",sl:"2ch",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]},{num:14,name:"Ezra",url:"ezra",abbr:"Ezr",sl:"ezr",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]},{num:15,name:"Nehemiah",url:"nehemiah",abbr:"Neh",sl:"ne",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]},{num:16,name:"Esther",url:"esther",abbr:"Est",sl:"es",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]},{num:17,name:"Job",url:"job",abbr:"Job",sl:"job",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]},{num:18,name:"Psalms",url:"psalms",abbr:"Psa",sl:"ps",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150]},{num:19,name:"Proverbs",url:"proverbs",abbr:"Pro",sl:"pr",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]},{num:20,name:"Ecclesiastes",url:"ecclesiastes",abbr:"Ecc",sl:"ec",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]},{num:21,name:"Song of Solomon",url:"song-of-solomon",abbr:"Sng",sl:"so",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]},{num:22,name:"Isaiah",url:"isaiah",abbr:"Isa",sl:"isa",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]},{num:23,name:"Jeremiah",url:"jeremiah",abbr:"Jer",sl:"jer",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]},{num:24,name:"Lamentations",url:"lamentations",abbr:"Lam",sl:"la",ch:[1,2,3,4,5]},{num:25,name:"Ezekiel",url:"ezekiel",abbr:"Ezk",sl:"eze",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]},{num:26,name:"Daniel",url:"daniel",abbr:"Dan",sl:"da",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]},{num:27,name:"Hosea",url:"hosea",abbr:"Hos",sl:"ho",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]},{num:28,name:"Joel",url:"joel",abbr:"Joe",sl:"joe",ch:[1,2,3]},{num:29,name:"Amos",url:"amos",abbr:"Amo",sl:"am",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]},{num:30,name:"Obadiah",url:"obadiah",abbr:"Oba",sl:"ob",ch:[1]},{num:31,name:"Jonah",url:"jonah",abbr:"Jon",sl:"jon",ch:[1,2,3,4]},{num:32,name:"Micah",url:"micah",abbr:"Mic",sl:"mic",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]},{num:33,name:"Nahum",url:"nahum",abbr:"Nah",sl:"na",ch:[1,2,3]},{num:34,name:"Habakkuk",url:"habakkuk",abbr:"Hab",sl:"hab",ch:[1,2,3]},{num:35,name:"Zephaniah",url:"zephaniah",abbr:"Zep",sl:"zep",ch:[1,2,3]},{num:36,name:"Haggai",url:"haggai",abbr:"Hag",sl:"hag",ch:[1,2]},{num:37,name:"Zechariah",url:"zechariah",abbr:"Zec",sl:"zec",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]},{num:38,name:"Malachi",url:"malachi",abbr:"Mal",sl:"mal",ch:[1,2,3,4]},{num:39,name:"Matthew",url:"matthew",abbr:"Mat",sl:"mt",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]},{num:40,name:"Mark",url:"mark",abbr:"Mrk",sl:"mr",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]},{num:41,name:"Luke",url:"luke",abbr:"Luk",sl:"lu",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]},{num:42,name:"John",url:"john",abbr:"Jhn",sl:"joh",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]},{num:43,name:"Acts",url:"acts",abbr:"Act",sl:"ac",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]},{num:44,name:"Romans",url:"romans",abbr:"Rom",sl:"ro",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]},{num:45,name:"1 Corinthians",url:"1-corinthians",abbr:"1Co",sl:"1co",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]},{num:46,name:"2 Corinthians",url:"2-corinthians",abbr:"2Co",sl:"2co",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]},{num:47,name:"Galatians",url:"galatians",abbr:"Gal",sl:"ga",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6]},{num:48,name:"Ephesians",url:"ephesians",abbr:"Eph",sl:"eph",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6]},{num:49,name:"Philippians",url:"philippians",abbr:"Phi",sl:"php",ch:[1,2,3,4]},{num:50,name:"Colossians",url:"colossians",abbr:"Col",sl:"col",ch:[1,2,3,4]},{num:51,name:"1 Thessalonians",url:"1-thessalonians",abbr:"1Th",sl:"1th",ch:[1,2,3,4,5]},{num:52,name:"2 Thessalonians",url:"2-thessalonians",abbr:"2Th",sl:"2th",ch:[1,2,3]},{num:53,name:"1 Timothy",url:"1-timothy",abbr:"1Ti",sl:"1ti",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6]},{num:54,name:"2 Timothy",url:"2-timothy",abbr:"2Ti",sl:"2ti",ch:[1,2,3,4]},{num:55,name:"Titus",url:"titus",abbr:"Tit",sl:"tit",ch:[1,2,3]},{num:56,name:"Philemon",url:"philemon",abbr:"Phm",sl:"phm",ch:[1]},{num:57,name:"Hebrews",url:"hebrews",abbr:"Heb",sl:"heb",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]},{num:58,name:"James",url:"james",abbr:"Jas",sl:"jas",ch:[1,2,3,4,5]},{num:59,name:"1 Peter",url:"1-peter",abbr:"1Pe",sl:"1pe",ch:[1,2,3,4,5]},{num:60,name:"2 Peter",url:"2-peter",abbr:"2Pe",sl:"2pe",ch:[1,2,3]},{num:61,name:"1 John",url:"1-john",abbr:"1Jn",sl:"1jo",ch:[1,2,3,4,5]},{num:62,name:"2 John",url:"2-john",abbr:"2Jn",sl:"2jo",ch:[1]},{num:63,name:"3 John",url:"3-john",abbr:"3Jn",sl:"3jo",ch:[1]},{num:64,name:"Jude",url:"jude",abbr:"Jud",sl:"jude",ch:[1]},{num:65,name:"Revelation",url:"revelation",abbr:"Rev",sl:"re",ch:[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]}]; var curWidth,curHeight,curTop,curLeft,masWidth,masHeight,sliderHeight=window.innerHeight-300,sliderTop=(window.innerHeight-sliderHeight)/2,popTop,popLeft,popWidth,popHeight,verse_selected,comsec,comlang,comabbr,translang,transabbr,translation_scope,sections=[],commentaries=[],languages=[],bibles=[],langtrans=default_langtrans.split('_'),language=langtrans[0],translation=langtrans[1];book=cur_com_bn,chapter=cur_com_cn,verse=cur_com_vs; function _ts_el(tag,opts){var el=document.createElement(tag);opts=opts||{};if(opts.cls){el.className=opts.cls;}if(opts.html!=null){el.innerHTML=opts.html;}if(opts.text!=null){el.textContent=opts.text;}if(opts.data){for(var k in opts.data){if(opts.data.hasOwnProperty(k)){el.setAttribute('data-'+k,opts.data[k]);}}}if(opts.style){for(var s in opts.style){if(opts.style.hasOwnProperty(s)){el.style[s]=opts.style[s];}}}if(opts.click){el.addEventListener('click',opts.click);}return el;} function getBible_data(t){var keys=t.split(',');keys.forEach(function(key){if(key==='com'){_ts_loadCom();}if(key==='bib'){_ts_loadBib();}});} function _ts_loadCom(){var commEl=document.querySelector('.commentary');comsec=commEl?commEl.getAttribute('data-com-sec'):'';comlang=commEl?commEl.getAttribute('data-com-lang'):'';comabbr=commEl?commEl.getAttribute('data-com-abbr'):'';var qs='bk='+encodeURIComponent(cur_com_bn)+'&ch='+encodeURIComponent(cur_com_cn)+'&vs='+encodeURIComponent(cur_com_vs)+'&cs='+encodeURIComponent(comsec)+'&cl='+encodeURIComponent(comlang)+'&ca='+encodeURIComponent(comabbr);fetch('/cgi-bin/bible/getBible_data.cgi?'+qs).then(function(r){return r.text();}).then(function(text){var doc=new DOMParser().parseFromString(text,'text/xml');var sn=_ts_xmlSplit(doc,'sn');var sa=_ts_xmlSplit(doc,'sa');var sf=_ts_xmlSplit(doc,'sf');for(var i=0;i u?o(n,r,t,e,u+1):0:0==i?1:-1}(o,n,r,t,0)})} var TS_PARENT_MODE={commentary:'section',translation:'language',chapter:'book',verse:'chapter'}; function _ts_isPerVerseUrl(path){var slash=path.lastIndexOf('/');if(slash =stem.length-1){return false;}return _ts_isAllDigits(stem.substring(0,dash))&&_ts_isAllDigits(stem.substring(dash+1));} function _ts_isAllDigits(s){if(!s||!s.length){return false;}for(var i=0;i 57){return false;}}return true;} function _ts_buildOverlay(){document.documentElement.style.overflowY='hidden';document.body.style.overflowY='hidden';updateSizes('470','650');var overlay=_ts_el('div',{cls:'overlayMaster',style:{top:curTop+'px',left:curLeft+'px',width:'100%',height:'100%'}});document.body.appendChild(overlay);var popup=_ts_el('div',{cls:'popupDiv noselect',style:{left:popLeft+'px',top:popTop+'px',width:popWidth+'px',height:popHeight+'px'}});overlay.appendChild(popup);} function _ts_buildHeader(mode){var parent=TS_PARENT_MODE[mode];var popup=document.querySelector('.popupDiv');var titleBar=_ts_el('div',{cls:'popupDiv-title'});popup.appendChild(titleBar);var prevBtn=_ts_el('span',{cls:'popupDiv-title-prev clickable',html:'❮',click:function(){if(parent){translationSelector_menu(parent);}}});titleBar.appendChild(prevBtn);if(!parent){prevBtn.style.visibility='hidden';}titleBar.appendChild(_ts_el('span',{html:mode.charAt(0).toUpperCase()+mode.slice(1)+' Selector'}));titleBar.appendChild(_ts_el('span',{cls:'popupDiv-title-closer clickable',html:'✖',click:function(){_ts_removeOverlay();translationSelector_menu('close');}}));} function _ts_removeOverlay(){var ov=document.querySelector('.overlayMaster');if(ov&&ov.parentNode){ov.parentNode.removeChild(ov);}} function _ts_buildChoices(mode){var items,count,start=0;if(mode==='section'){items=sections;count=items.length;}else if(mode==='commentary'){items=sortByColumn(commentaries.filter(function(c){return c.sec===comsec;}),['pop'],['ASC']);count=items.length;}else if(mode==='language'){items=languages;count=items.length;}else if(mode==='book'||mode==='chapter'){items=book_data.filter(function(b){return translation_scope==='1'?b.num 38:b.num 0);}else{takesVerse=(parseInt(verse,10)>0);}if(takesVerse){translationSelector_menu('verse');}else{_ts_sendThemBack('reference-noverse');}}});}if(mode==='verse'){return _ts_el('div',{cls:'popupDiv-item clickable selector-chapter',data:{number:o},html:o,click:function(){_ts_removeOverlay();verse=parseInt(this.getAttribute('data-number'),10);_ts_sendThemBack('reference-verse');}});}if(mode==='language'){return _ts_el('div',{cls:'popupDiv-item clickable selector-languages',data:{'trans-lang':items[o].abbr},html:items[o].name,click:function(){_ts_removeOverlay();translang=this.getAttribute('data-trans-lang');translationSelector_menu('translation');}});}if(mode==='translation'){return _ts_el('div',{cls:'popupDiv-item clickable selector-translation',data:{'trans-abbr':items[o].trans},html:items[o].name,click:function(){_ts_removeOverlay();transabbr=this.getAttribute('data-trans-abbr');_ts_sendThemBack('translation');}});}} function _ts_sendThemBack(reason){var origPath=window.location.pathname;var parts=origPath.split('/');var noVerse=(reason==='reference-noverse');var inputIsPerVerse=_ts_isPerVerseUrl(origPath);if(parts[1]==='interlinear-study-bible'){parts=parts.slice(0,5);parts[3]=book_data[book].url;parts[4]=noVerse?(chapter+'.html'):(chapter+'-'+verse+'.html');}else if(parts[1]==='commentary'){parts=parts.slice(0,4);parts[2]=book_data[book].url;parts[3]=noVerse?(chapter+'.html'):(chapter+'-'+verse+'.html');}else if(parts[1]==='commentaries'){parts[2]=comlang;parts[3]=comabbr;if(inputIsPerVerse){parts=parts.slice(0,6);parts[4]=book_data[book].url;parts[5]=noVerse?(chapter+'.html'):(chapter+'-'+verse+'.html');}else{parts=parts.slice(0,5);parts[4]=book_data[book].url+'-'+chapter+'.html';}}else if(parts[1]==='bible'){parts=parts.slice(0,6);parts[2]=translang;parts[3]=transabbr;parts[4]=book_data[book].url;parts[5]=(verse duction ","Verses 1-14","Verses 15-22","Verses 23-33","Verses 34-40","Verses 41-46"]; function

Pericope (part_of)

절 (explains)

bible-text/mat-22-41, bible-text/mat-22-42, bible-text/mat-22-43, bible-text/mat-22-44, bible-text/mat-22-45, bible-text/mat-22-46

Source

> 바리새 사람들이 모여 있을 때에 예수께서 그들에게 물으셨다. "너희는 그리스도를 어떻게 생각하느냐? 그가 누구의 자손이냐?" 그들이 "다윗의 자손입니다" 하고 대답하였다. 예수께서 그들에게 말씀하셨다. "그러면 어찌하여 다윗이 성령에 감동되어 그를 주라 부르며 말하기를, '주께서 내 주께 말씀하시기를, 내가 네 원수들을 네 발 아래 두기까지 너는 내 오른편에 앉아 있어라' 하였느냐? 다윗이 그를 주라 부른다면, 어떻게 그가 다윗의 자손이 되겠느냐?" 아무도 예수께 한마디도 대답하지 못하였고, 그날부터 감히 그에게 더 묻는 사람도 없었다. (마 22:41-46)

바리새 사람들은 여러 질문을 예수님께 드렸는데, 그들이 그분을 궁지에 몰아넣으려 생각했지만 오히려 자신들만 드러냈다. 이제 그분이 그들에게 질문하실 차례이다. 그들이 함께 모여 있을 때 그분이 이것을 하신다(마 22:41). 그분은 그들 중 한 사람을 따로 불러내지 않으셨다. 그들이 함께 뭉쳐 그분을 의논하고 대적하고 있는 동안, 그분은 모인 그들 모두를 상대로 그들을 더욱 당혹스럽게 하셨다. 주목하라. 하나님은 원수들이 가장 강해졌을 때 그들을 무너뜨리기를 기뻐하신다. "너희는 연합하라, 그러나 깨어질 것이다"(사 8:9-10).

**첫째, 그리스도께서 그들이 쉽게 대답할 수 있는 질문을 하신다.** 그것은 그들 자신의 요리문답에 있는 질문이었다. "너희는 그리스도를 어떻게 생각하느냐? 그가 누구의 자손이냐?" 누가 약속받은 메시아로 오리라고 기대되는가? 그들은 쉽게 "다윗의 자손"이라고 대답하였다. 그것은 메시아의 통상적인 호칭이었다. 성경을 해설하는 학자들이 그렇게 가르쳤다. 다윗의 씨는 영원히 이어질 것이다(시 89:35-36). 이사야 9:7에서는 다윗의 보좌 위에 앉을 것이라 하였고, 이사야 11:1에서는 이새의 줄기에서 한 싹이 나리라 하였다. 다윗과 맺은 왕위의 언약은 그리스도와 맺은 구속의 언약의 모형이었다. 그리스도가 다윗의 자손이라면, 그분은 진정하고도 참된 사람이셨다. "우리가 다윗 안에서 열 몫을 가졌다"(삼하 20:1). 그렇다면 스스로 우리의 본성을 취하신 다윗의 자손 안에서는 얼마나 더 그러한가? "너희는 그리스도를 어떻게 생각하느냐?" 그들은 그분에 대한 율법의 질문들을 드렸지만, 그분은 오셔서 약속에 관한 질문을 하신다. 많은 이들이 율법에 너무 가득 차서 그리스도를 잊어버린다. 자신의 의무가 그분의 공로와 은혜 없이 자신을 구원할 것처럼. 우리 각자가 진지하게 스스로에게 물어야 한다. "나는 그리스도를 어떻게 생각하는가?"

**둘째, 그들이 대답하기 어려운 난제를 제기하신다(마 22:43-45).** 많은 이들이 진리를 쉽게 확언하면서 충분히 알고 있다고 자부하지만, 진리를 확증하고 변호하고 방어하도록 요청받으면 부끄러움을 드러낸다. 그리스도께서 제기하신 반론은 이것이다. 그리스도가 다윗의 자손이라면, 다윗이 어찌하여 그를 성령에 감동되어 주라 불렀는가? 그분은 이로써 그들을 함정에 빠뜨리려 하신 것이 아니라, 그들이 믿기를 꺼리는 진리, 즉 기대된 메시아가 하나님이시라는 것을 가르치려 하신 것이다.

(1) 다윗이 그리스도를 주라 불렀다는 것은 분명히 알 수 있다. 그것도 성령에 감동되어, 신적으로 영감받아 예언의 영으로 활동하면서. "주의 영이 내 안에서 말씀하셨다"(삼하 23:1-2). 다윗이 그리스도를 주라 부른 것이 성령에 의한 것임을 증명하기 위해 그분은 시편 110:1을 인용하신다. 학자들 자신이 이 시편이 그리스도에 관한 것으로 이해하였다. 확실히 거기서 선지자는 그분에 관해 말하며 오직 그분에 관해서만 말한다. 그것은 그리스도 교리의 예언적 요약으로서, 그분이 선지자·제사장·왕의 직분을 낮아지심과 높아지심 두 가지 모두에서 행하시는 것을 묘사한다. 그리스도는 높아지심 중에 있는 구속자를 보여 주는 이 구절 전체를 인용하신다. [1] 하나님의 오른편에 앉으심. 그분의 앉으심은 안식과 통치 두 가지를 나타낸다. 하나님의 오른편에 앉으심은 비할 데 없는 영예와 주권적 권세를 나타낸다(히 8:1을 보라; 빌 2:9; 엡 1:20). [2] 원수들을 굴복시키심. 그분은 거기 앉으셔서 모두가 그분의 친구나 발판이 될 때까지 기다리신다. 육적인 마음은 어디 있든 그리스도에 대한 적대이다. 그것은 그분의 발 앞으로 불려 오는 기꺼운 백성들의 회심으로 굴복되고(사 41:2처럼), 그분의 발 아래에 놓여야 할 완고한 대적자들의 혼돈으로 굴복된다. 그러나 이 구절이 인용된 것은, 다윗이 메시아를 자신의 주라 불렀다는 것을 위해서이다. 여호와께서 내 주께 말씀하셨다. 이것은 우리에게 성경을 해석할 때 한 구절의 주요 내용과 의미만이 아니라, 성령께서 그 내용을 표현하기 위해 선택하신 단어와 어구들에도 주목하고 그것을 발전시켜야 한다는 것을 가르쳐 준다. "내 주"라는 그 단어에서 좋은 교훈이 나온다.

(2) 메시아가 하나님이심을 믿지 않는 자들에게는, 그리스도가 다윗의 자손이라면 이 불합리함을 해결하기가 쉽지 않다(마 22:45). 아버지가 자신의 아들, 자신의 후계자의 전임자에 대해 그를 자신의 주라고 말하는 것은 어울리지 않는다. 다윗이 그를 주라 부른다면, 그것이 더 분명한 진리로 놓여 있다(마 22:45). 그리스도의 인성과 낮아지심에 관해 말하는 것은 무엇이든 그분의 신성한 본성과 주권에 관한 진리와 일관성 있게 이해되어야 한다. 우리는 그분이 다윗의 주이심을 굳게 붙잡고, 그로써 그분이 다윗의 자손이심을 설명해야 한다. 성경의 겉보기 불일치들은—이 경우처럼—수용될 뿐 아니라 전체의 아름다움과 조화에 기여할 수 있다.

**셋째, 이 온화한 시험의 성과를 살펴본다.** (1) 그것이 그들을 당혹스럽게 하였다(마 22:46). "아무도 예수께 한마디도 대답하지 못하였다." 그들이 알지 못하거나 메시아가 하나님이심을 인정하려 하지 않거나 했는데, 그것만이 이 어려움을 풀 유일한 열쇠이다. 이 학자들이 그때 대답할 수 없었던 것을, 하나님을 감사하게도, 복음의 이해로 인도함을 받은 가장 단순한 그리스도인도 이제는 설명할 수 있다. 그리스도는 하나님으로서 다윗의 주이시고, 사람으로서 다윗의 자손이시다. 예수 그리스도는 만물 위의 하나님으로 영원히 복되시다는 이 진리를 굳게 붙잡지 않으면, 우리는 빠져나올 수 없는 어려움에 빠지게 된다. 그분의 멀리 있는 조상인 다윗이 그분을 주라 불렀다. 하물며 그분의 직계 어머니인 마리아는 그분을 잉태한 후에 그분을 주와 하나님으로, 자신의 구주로 불렀다(눅 1:46-47).

(2) 그것이 그들을 잠잠하게 하였다. "그날부터 감히 그에게 더 묻는 사람도 없었다." 주목하라. 하나님은 많은 이들이 구원을 받게 하여 자신을 영화롭게 하시지 않는 자들이 침묵하게 하여 자신을 영화롭게 하실 것이다. 많은 이들이 말씀으로 납득되지만 회심하지는 않는다. 이들이 회심되었다면, 그들은 특히 "우리가 구원받으려면 어떻게 해야 합니까?"라는 더 많은 질문을 그분께 드렸을 것이다. 그러나 그들이 자신들의 목적을 달성할 수 없었기에, 더 이상 그분과 관계하지 않으려 하였다. 그러나 이처럼 자신의 스승과 다투는 모든 자들은, 이 바리새 사람들과 율법사들이 여기서 납득된 것처럼, 그 상대가 얼마나 불균형한지를 납득하게 될 것이다.

---

원주석

바이블위키 biblewiki.net · PD/CC0 · status:draft (verified 승격은 사람만) · 요약은 구조 정보만 제공하며 본문 원문을 왜곡하지 않습니다 · Karpathy LLM Wiki 패턴