Jamieson-Fausset-Brown on 1 Corinthians 11:20
COM commentary-section · status:draft · license:PD
20. When . . . therefore —Resuming the thread of discourse from :- . this is not to —rather, "there is no such thing as eating the LORD'S Supper"; it is not possible where each is greedily intent only on devouring "HIS OWN supper," and some are excluded altogether, not having been waited for ( 1 Corinthians 11:33 ), where some are "drunken," while others are "hungry" ( 1 Corinthians 11:21 ). The love-feast usually preceded the Lord's Supper (as eating the Passover came before the Lord's Supper at the first institution of the latter). It was a club-feast, where each brought his portion, and the rich, extra portions for the poor; from it the bread and wine were taken for the Eucharist; and it was at it that the excesses took place, which made a true celebration of the Lord's Supper during or after it, with true discernment of its solemnity, out of the question. return to ' Top of Page ' <a name="verse-21" class="com-number"
Pericope (part_of)
- part_of
pericope/per-1co-11-003
절 (explains)
Source
source-manifest/jfb— Jamieson-Fausset-Brown (PD)- evidence_grade: T_theological
엣지 (그래프 연결)
나가는(out)language_pack/jfb-1co-11-20-20-ko